Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
Heroes of Ukraine according to the Institute of National Memory. Photo: Institute of National Memory
Eighty-five years ago, on June 30, 1941, the “Act of Proclamation of the Ukrainian State” was announced in Lviv. Clause 3 of the document stated:
“The Ukrainian State will work closely with National Socialist Greater Germany, which, under the leadership of its Leader Adolf Hitler, is creating a new order in Europe and the world.”
The Act glorified OUN leader Bandera and OUN founder Konovalets.
On the same day, a National Assembly was held, where UGCC Metropolitan Yosyf Slipyj and the Uniate chaplain Ivan Hrynioch delivered speeches. In addition, a greeting from Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky was read aloud containing the words:
“We welcome the victorious German Army as the liberator from the enemy.”
At the conclusion of the assembly, participants sent “greetings to the Creator and Leader of Great Germany, ADOLF HITLER, and greetings to the Glorious German Invincible Army.”
The record further noted that
“all those present especially warmly and sincerely greeted the high-ranking officers of the German army who attended the Assembly.”
On July 1, the Verkhovna Rada passed the law on the “Ukrainian National Pantheon.”
The law states that the Pantheon may commemorate, among others, individuals who made an outstanding contribution to the development of religion in Ukraine. Given the privileged position currently enjoyed by the UGCC, there is little doubt that efforts will be made to include figures such as Sheptytsky or Slipyj.
There is, however, a problem.
According to the law, the Pantheon may not commemorate persons who fall under the restrictions established by Ukraine’s laws “On the Condemnation of the Communist and National Socialist (Nazi) Totalitarian Regimes...”
As we understand it, it may be rather difficult to prove that individuals who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall within the scope of legislation condemning Nazism.
Incidentally, this issue applies not only to Uniate bishops, but also to Bandera, Stetsko, Melnyk, Shukhevych, and others.
Still, there is a suspicion that nobody will attempt to prove anything at all.
It may be far easier simply to remain silent and pretend that none of it ever happened.
Read also
UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount
Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?
Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions
Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”