Amsterdam: Ukrainian government has weaponized religion against its people
American human rights lawyer Robert Amsterdam. Photo: epaimages.com
American human rights lawyer Robert Amsterdam has revealed that a document justifying the persecution of millions of Orthodox Christians in Ukraine by the Ukrainian authorities is being actively circulated in Washington. Amsterdam published an analysis of an article by a certain Lauren Homer entitled "Ukraine’s pending law on religious organizations with Russian Headquarters" on his website.
According to the lawyer, this document "does not merit a response; however, the freedom of religion in Ukraine today is literally a matter of life and death for many Ukrainians."
He stated that the Ukrainian authorities had weaponized religion against their own people, and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church "is facing an unmitigated campaign of intimidation."
The lawyer also believes that Ukraine is now one of the least tolerant places in the world for religious freedom, and millions of Ukrainians are at risk of losing their religious home through the actions of their own government.
Amsterdam noted that there are fundamental misstatements of fact and one of law in Homer's analysis that undermine her credibility.
In his article, Homer contends that the bill banning the UOC is "inarrowly drawn and limited in its effect". However, Robert Amsterdam believes that Bill No. 8371 "will close the parishes of the UOC across the country, preventing the millions of ordinary UOC believers from worshiping in their church, with their religious leaders, and in community with one another."
"The law is draconian and disproportionate. After its passage, the UOC will not be able to operate on Ukrainian soil. ...> The law amounts to a form of targeted discrimination, which will collectively punish innocent Ukrainian citizens by depriving them of the church they call home," wrote the lawyer.
Commenting on Homer's statement that "the only canonical Church in Ukraine is the OCU", Amsterdam noted that the history of the UOC reaches back nearly a millennium, while the OCU was established by the Ukrainian authorities only in 2018.
"...> the canonical legitimacy of our church, the UOC, is uncontested. Moreover, it is deeply inconsistent with the basic notions of freedom of religion for a government to tell millions of UOC worshipers that they must convert to a new church with a different history and different leaders if they wish to practice their faith," he added.
Moreover, Amsterdam emphasized that in her publication, Homer blatantly misunderstands international human rights law and completely ignores Ukraine's legal obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1977.
"Homer’s gross misreading of international law turns human rights on its head by using human rights law to justify Ukraine’s flagrant violations of the freedom of religion.," wrote the human rights lawyer.
As reported by the UOJ, it became known when the Rada will consider the bill on the UOC in the second reading.
Read also
Ostapenko: Everyone in UCCRO feels fine except the “FSB UOC”
The director of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra National Reserve called the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches “a wonderful organization.”
Khmelnytskyi Eparchy donates funds for treatment of 12-year-old girl
UOC believers raised UAH 20,000 for Anastasiia Mamchur as part of an eparchial charity campaign.
Shevchuk: We had to convince world UOC ban does not violate religious freedom
The UGCC head claims that by banning the UOC, the state is not violating religious freedom but merely protecting the Church’s faithful from Moscow propaganda.
Lavra reserve head estimates damage to Dormition Cathedral at €15 million
Maksym Ostapenko said restoring the Dormition Cathedral would take at least a couple of years and require major funding.
DESS official says state should not govern the Church
A DESS official called for cooperation between the state and the Church for the benefit of citizens.
Poltava court upholds mobilization of Protestant pastor
A court in the Poltava region ruled that a prior criminal conviction and religious beliefs do not exempt a person from military service.