Judge on UOJ сase: We do not delve into the merits – guilty or not guilty
Illustrative photo: porady.org.ua
On July 3, 2024, during a session of the Court of Appeals where the appeal against the decision of the Solomiansky Court to extend UOJ journalist Valery Stupnitsky's detention was considered, the judge refused to listen to the lawyer's arguments about the unfounded suspicion against the journalist.
In his speech, the defense lawyer pointed out why the accusations against Valeriy Stupnitsky were baseless.
One of the judges interrupted the lawyer, stating: "The court does not delve into this. We do not decide whether he is guilty or not."
As previously reported by UOJ, during the court session, the judges also did not want to hear the defense speech of UOJ journalist Valeriy Stupnitsky. As a result, the panel of judges decided to reject the appeal and keep the journalist in custody.
Read also
OCU Claims Pope Is Playing into Moscow's Hands
An OCU cleric rebuked the Greek Catholics for their silence amid the Pope's statements about the need for peace.
Iran raises $1.3 million for sacrificial offering to pray for ayatollah's recovery
Iranians outraged by call to fund sacrificial ritual for the health of Ayatollah Khamenei.
Zelensky signs law on the National Pantheon
The National Pantheon of Ukraine will have a non-denominational status.
Ukraine now allows matronymics alongside patronymics
Ukrainian legislation has allowed people to change their patronymic since 2021, including replacing the father's name with the mother's name.
Kharkiv's gay community announces LGBT march
At the pride march in Kharkiv, participants will demand the legalization of same-sex marriages in Ukraine.
Ukrainians criticize official who called pilgrimage to Pochaiv "horrifying"
Threads users did not support the head of the "Ancient Kyiv" Reserve, Roman Malenkov, who called the UOC pilgrimage "a horrifying horror."