UOJ journalists' lawyers accuse investigator of manipulation

Volodymyr Bobechko, Valeriy Stupnitsky, and Andriy Ovcharenko. Photo: UOJ

On August 19, 2024, during a court session regarding Investigator Savenko's motion to limit the time journalists from the UOJ and their defense lawyers had to review the case materials, the lawyers accused the investigator of manipulation.

Specifically, Valeriy Stupnitsky’s lawyer, Roman Gontarev, stated that even after the motion was filed, when all volumes should have been bound and numbered, Savenko repeatedly cited different numbers for the total volumes.

According to Gontarev, on August 16, a week after the investigator's motion was filed, Savenko claimed that, besides the first 10 volumes, the remaining ones were "not yet formed".

“On July 26, after access to the materials was granted, I asked the investigator how many volumes there were. He said about 30, then the number grew to 32, and then to 38. Today, I learned from this motion that there are supposedly 42 volumes. I am more than sure that, except for the first 10 volumes, the rest are not yet formed. That is, they are not bound, and the descriptions are not prepared,” said Gontarev. He expressed frustration that despite this, the investigator decided to submit a motion to the court claiming that the journalists were refusing to review the case. Gontarev requested that the court compel Savenko to provide all the materials or at least their description.

Interestingly, during the lawyer's statement, Investigator Savenko, sitting across from him, was seen sleeping with his head resting on his hands.

Gontarev emphasized that the case materials should be organized chronologically, with evidence of crimes presented first. According to the lawyer, the first 10 volumes provided to him for review contained no such evidence.

Andriy Ovcharenko's lawyer, Ilya Serafimov, requested the removal of Investigator Savenko due to his bias.

In particular, he noted that all the suspects had repeatedly asked the investigator to summon their lawyer when materials were brought for review. However, Savenko never complied. Serafimov also reported several instances where the investigator promised to send him copies of materials but failed to do so.

Earlier, the UOJ reported that the court had limited the time for UOJ journalists to review the investigation materials.

Read also

In Baturyn, armed police "guard" convent from nuns and parishioners

Sisters of the St. Nicholas Krupytsky Convent of the UOC and local believers have been denied entry to the monastery grounds for hours, which has been turned into a restricted facility.

UOC's foreign mission reports manipulations around its activities

The Western European Vicariate emphasized that UOC parishes abroad operate independently and were created for the spiritual care of the Ukrainian diaspora.

Clergy meeting of Western European Vicariate of UOC held in Italy

The annual gathering of clergy of the Vicariate took place in the city of Bari under the chairmanship of Bishop Veniamin.

Photo of destroyed MinCulture facility published online

The public organization reported the destruction of a church in Velykyi Khodachkiv; authorities remain inactive.

MP agrees with OCU on destruction of royal family fresco in Volodymyr cathedral

Despite the fact that the Dormition Cathedral in Volodymyr was built with funds provided by Nicholas II, the OCU will destroy the fresco depicting the Royal Passion-Bearers.

UGCC calls on authorities to move brothels out of Lviv

A UGCC cleric says the war has “saved Lviv from the Babylon that had already begun to take shape in the city.”