Norwegian organization Forum 18 criticizes Ukrainian law No. 3894

A rally against the UOC. Photo: Ukrainian photo

The Norwegian organization Forum 18 has criticized Ukrainian law No. 3894-IX, which bans the activities of the Russian Orthodox Church and its affiliated religious organizations in Ukraine, including the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). In its analysis, Forum 18, which aims to defend religious freedom, highlighted several key points of concern about the law. The analysis was cited by "Christians Against War."

The main points of criticism are as follows:

  1. Lack of necessity for proof of illegal activity: The law allows for the prohibition of any religious organization associated in any form with the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) without the need for evidence of illegal behavior. This approach violates international human rights standards to the effect that punishments should be imposed only for specific illegal actions, not based on presumed affiliations.
  2. Vagueness of terminology: Forum 18 emphasizes that the law contains vague terms such as "influence" and "blessing", allowing the state to interpret and apply it arbitrarily. This poses a risk to many religious communities that could be banned without clear justification.
  3. Complications for the UOC to prove independence: Despite the UOC declaring its independence from the ROC in May 2022, the law makes this independence legally unrecognized. Any action by Moscow Patriarch Kirill, interpreted as a "blessing", could be used to ban a community, even if it claims autocephaly.
  4. Inability of the UOC to avoid liquidation: The organization notes that even if the UOC officially declares its autocephaly, it may not be enough to prevent its communities from being banned.
  5. Leeway for abuse: The law contains too many vague provisions, which could lead to arbitrary decisions to ban religious organizations.

Thus, Forum 18 argues that law No. 3894-IX excessively expands the state's control over religious communities, violating international principles of freedom of religion and posing a threat to Ukrainian religious organizations, which may be unjustly banned.

As previously reported by the Union of Orthodox Journalists, a national audit of UOC property was initiated by the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnopolitcs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS).

Read also

OCU explains why beggars are driven away from St. Michael’s Cathedral

A cleric of Dumenko’s structure admitted that beggars are not tolerated at the OCU’s main monastery because of their “high incomes” and the desire not to damage the site’s image before foreign tourists.

UOC Chancellor: Venerable Anthony founded a monastery, not a reserve

Metropolitan Anthony said that the attempt to turn the Lavra into a state preserve is, in essence, an attempt to lock living Orthodoxy behind a door.

Dumenko discusses countering hostile influence in spiritual life with PO head

The heads of the OCU and the Presidential Office touched on state-church relations and “spiritual security” in wartime.

Albanian Primate speaks about ways to resolve OCU problem

Archbishop John is convinced: disagreements between Moscow and Constantinople can only be overcome through love and dialogue, but not through choosing "sides".

National Memory Institute and SBU open exhibition on UGCC liquidation

An exhibition on the repression of the Uniates has opened in the capital, while state officials search for historical parallels with the present day.

OCU "priest" “allows” parishioners to use priest’s cassock for sex games

Ruslan Usmedinsky said that using a priest’s cassock as a prop for role-playing games can strengthen relationships between couples.