On Hanukkah, Christmas and the unity of Ukraine
Ukrainian politicians lighting up a menorah. Photo: UOJ’s collage
The country’s top officials recorded greetings for the occasion, and Zelensky even declared that it “unites all Ukrainians”.
Curiously, however, we didn’t see the nation’s leaders attending church services.
Meanwhile, several political and military leaders of Ukraine took an active part in Hanukkah celebrations, which coincided with the date of the New Style Christmas. Zelensky lit a menorah at the Presidential Office, Kyiv Mayor Klitschko lit the largest menorah in Europe in Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square) and another menorah at the Kyiv History Museum. The head of the Defence Ministry's Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR), Budanov, lit a “specially created GUR hanukkiah” at the Kyiv Jewish Community Centre.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the authorities showing such attention to the Jewish community. However, it makes up only a fraction of one percent of Ukraine’s population. By contrast, there are approximately 6 million believers of the UOC. These believers will soon be celebrating Christmas according to the Julian calendar, as their ancestors have done for generations. Yet in 2025, the majority of these millions won’t even be able to attend festive services—Zelensky has taken away their public holiday.
So, it seems that some (very small) religious communities in Ukraine are given honour and respect, while others face slander and restrictions.
Is Ukraine truly united?
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.