On the criticism of peace negotiations by Uniates
Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Live Television
The head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, has spoken out against peace negotiations currently being actively promoted by the new US administration. He claims that these negotiations are happening "behind our backs" and that "we are being coerced into some imaginary truce, which in no way constitutes a just peace for Ukraine."
So, what does Shevchuk propose instead? What does he consider to be a "just peace"? He insists that he communicates with God and that the Saviour "has a plan to save Ukraine". According to him, Christ "comes to me and you today and calls: 'Let us save together, let us build the future of the Ukrainian people together.'"
No details of the "Divine plan" are provided. It seems the plan is simply to keep fighting. At this point, it's worth recalling some facts.
1. The rhetoric of the UGCC (like the OCU's and the UOC-KP's) has been focused on "opposing" the enemy since the days of the Euromaidan. And that enemy is not the devil, but Putin and Russia. The end of the war for them would be catastrophic. Simply because their "military" theology would become irrelevant in an instant.
2. Shevchuk's statement is essentially a support for the position of the Ukrainian President's office. Even specific phrases (such as "being forced into a ceasefire") echo the discourse used by government spokespersons.
3. Over three years of war, 11 UGCC churches have been damaged, none of them destroyed. In comparison, the UOC has had 340 churches damaged, 31 of which were completely destroyed. This statistic is understandable. Military action has been concentrated in the eastern part of the country, where the presence of the UGCC is minimal. Almost all of the Uniate churches are concentrated in the "peaceful" western part of Ukraine. True though, Russian missiles occasionally reach there, but in general, it remains a peaceful region. Additionally, half of all UGCC parishes are abroad, in the diaspora.
4. In the summer of 2024, Shevchuk confessed live on air (thinking the microphone was off) that the UGCC hides workers involved in the construction or repair of Uniate churches from mobilisation.
In conclusion, the position of the head of the Uniates is as follows: others are suffering from the war somewhere out there, not we. Let someone else fight, but not us. We will continue to sabotage peace negotiations, even without knowing their terms, and speculate on the name of Christ.
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.