On the criticism of peace negotiations by Uniates

Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Live Television

The head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, has spoken out against peace negotiations currently being actively promoted by the new US administration. He claims that these negotiations are happening "behind our backs" and that "we are being coerced into some imaginary truce, which in no way constitutes a just peace for Ukraine."

So, what does Shevchuk propose instead? What does he consider to be a "just peace"? He insists that he communicates with God and that the Saviour "has a plan to save Ukraine". According to him, Christ "comes to me and you today and calls: 'Let us save together, let us build the future of the Ukrainian people together.'"

No details of the "Divine plan" are provided. It seems the plan is simply to keep fighting. At this point, it's worth recalling some facts.

1. The rhetoric of the UGCC (like the OCU's and the UOC-KP's) has been focused on "opposing" the enemy since the days of the Euromaidan. And that enemy is not the devil, but Putin and Russia. The end of the war for them would be catastrophic. Simply because their "military" theology would become irrelevant in an instant.

2. Shevchuk's statement is essentially a support for the position of the Ukrainian President's office. Even specific phrases (such as "being forced into a ceasefire") echo the discourse used by government spokespersons.

3. Over three years of war, 11 UGCC churches have been damaged, none of them destroyed. In comparison, the UOC has had 340 churches damaged, 31 of which were completely destroyed. This statistic is understandable. Military action has been concentrated in the eastern part of the country, where the presence of the UGCC is minimal. Almost all of the Uniate churches are concentrated in the "peaceful" western part of Ukraine. True though, Russian missiles occasionally reach there, but in general, it remains a peaceful region. Additionally, half of all UGCC parishes are abroad, in the diaspora.

4. In the summer of 2024, Shevchuk confessed live on air (thinking the microphone was off) that the UGCC hides workers involved in the construction or repair of Uniate churches from mobilisation.

In conclusion, the position of the head of the Uniates is as follows: others are suffering from the war somewhere out there, not we. Let someone else fight, but not us. We will continue to sabotage peace negotiations, even without knowing their terms, and speculate on the name of Christ.

Read also

Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?

It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?

Our raider–officials should brace themselves?

Someday the Zelensky era will end. And when it does, there will be plenty of claims to answer for. The war against Orthodoxy will be among the chief indictments.

State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation

Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?

Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed

According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.

"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine

At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?

Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?

Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?