How did Christ and the Apostle Paul describe OCU's adept Hryshchuk?
Roman Hryshchuk, hooded, during the church raid in Verkhni Stanivtsi. Photo: UOJ
He admits they came under cover of darkness – because the UOC faithful are present during the day. In his own words, he wanted to avoid creating footage that could be used by Russian media, portraying “OCU raiders crucifying Russian-speaking girls.” That was his idea of a joke.
But when one recalls the image of a young UOC woman, her face bloodied – struck with a stick, whether by Hryshchuk himself or one of his “brother priests” – the humor vanishes. It becomes something else entirely: a chilling symbol of sacrilege.
“Our community,” Hryshchuk said, “in order to avoid media provocations, is forced to act outside working hours, and in secret.”
Let those words settle: outside working hours… in secret. They echo something far more ancient – and far more ominous.
Do they not call to mind the words of Christ Himself, who spoke of those who “do not enter the sheepfold by the door, but climb in by another way”? Or the solemn warning of the Apostle Paul, who described those who come “like a thief in the night”?
Scripture names such people plainly.
A thief. A robber.
What better words could describe the one who calls himself a priest, yet comes cloaked in night, wielding violence, and desecrating what is holy?
This is not just a matter of broken doors and shattered peace. It is a question of truth – and the name by which such deeds are known before God.
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.