On a priest who voluntarily joined the OCU
Dumenko personally welcomes Vadym Hvozd from Kalynivka. Photo: OCU
Opponents often accuse the UOJ and other UOC-affiliated outlets of ignoring the cases of priests who voluntarily transfer to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU). We wouldn’t mind reporting on such cases – but statistically, they are vanishingly rare compared to those who have refused to switch. Why is that? Judge for yourself.
The OCU's official website published a full article dedicated to the fact that Epifaniy Dumenko personally received the rector of the Exaltation of the Cross Church, Fr. Vadym Gvozd, from the village of Kalynivka in Zhytomyr Oblast.
Let’s not get into why a priest would decide – seven years after the creation of the OCU – to suddenly “follow the Tomos of Autocephaly.”
Let’s look at something else. Kalynivka is a tiny village in Zhytomyr Oblast, home to just a few hundred residents. According to official claims, over 1,500 parishes have joined the OCU voluntarily. So for the “primate of an autocephalous church,” meeting with such a cleric should be a routine event, hardly worth mentioning. In fact, Dumenko shouldn't be meeting with him at all, since he heads the Kyiv Diocese. The OCU has separate Zhytomyr–Ovruch and Zhytomyr–Polissia dioceses, and Hvozd belongs to one of those.
Nevertheless, Epifaniy received him personally – and the news of the meeting appears alongside coverage of Dumenko’s encounter with the Canadian ambassador, his sermon on the fifth Sunday of Lent, and other key events in the OCU’s life.
What does all this tell us? The answer is simple: voluntary transfers to the OCU are so rare that Dumenko has to personally promote them, even when they involve “outside” clergy from remote regions. And that speaks volumes.
Read also
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.
Ukraine’s court religions: conscience or LGBT?
“Moscow priests” will be branded not only for refusing to join the OCU and for following the Julian calendar, but also for “homophobia.”
Does Patriarch Bartholomew consider Ukrainians bearers of the "Russian World"?
The Primate of the Church of Constantinople arrived in Vilnius to introduce the newly appointed Exarch of Lithuania, Bishop Panaretos of Tamasos.
A lesson for the modern Church from the depths of ages
St. Leontius had no desire whatsoever to be “one of their own” for the local authorities or non-believers.