On a priest who voluntarily joined the OCU
Dumenko personally welcomes Vadym Hvozd from Kalynivka. Photo: OCU
Opponents often accuse the UOJ and other UOC-affiliated outlets of ignoring the cases of priests who voluntarily transfer to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU). We wouldn’t mind reporting on such cases – but statistically, they are vanishingly rare compared to those who have refused to switch. Why is that? Judge for yourself.
The OCU's official website published a full article dedicated to the fact that Epifaniy Dumenko personally received the rector of the Exaltation of the Cross Church, Fr. Vadym Gvozd, from the village of Kalynivka in Zhytomyr Oblast.
Let’s not get into why a priest would decide – seven years after the creation of the OCU – to suddenly “follow the Tomos of Autocephaly.”
Let’s look at something else. Kalynivka is a tiny village in Zhytomyr Oblast, home to just a few hundred residents. According to official claims, over 1,500 parishes have joined the OCU voluntarily. So for the “primate of an autocephalous church,” meeting with such a cleric should be a routine event, hardly worth mentioning. In fact, Dumenko shouldn't be meeting with him at all, since he heads the Kyiv Diocese. The OCU has separate Zhytomyr–Ovruch and Zhytomyr–Polissia dioceses, and Hvozd belongs to one of those.
Nevertheless, Epifaniy received him personally – and the news of the meeting appears alongside coverage of Dumenko’s encounter with the Canadian ambassador, his sermon on the fifth Sunday of Lent, and other key events in the OCU’s life.
What does all this tell us? The answer is simple: voluntary transfers to the OCU are so rare that Dumenko has to personally promote them, even when they involve “outside” clergy from remote regions. And that speaks volumes.
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.