Not to become a Judas
“The Kiss of Judas.” Painting by Ilya Glazunov
Today is Holy Wednesday – the day Judas betrayed Christ. Soon, the Savior will be seized and crucified. And in our time, it is impossible not to see the eerie parallels between the Gospel events and what is happening to the Church in Ukraine today. Once again, the Church is slandered and spat upon by modern-day “high priests.” Once again, the crowd, stirred up by their whispers, cries out in unison: “Away with the Moscow priest!” – “Crucify Him!”
Today, it is trendy to paint Judas in a sympathetic light – as if he meant well. They say he longed for the happiness of his people. That he provoked Christ, hoping He would at last reveal His power in the face of torment and death – strike down the wicked, drive out the Roman occupiers, and rise as a glorious earthly king of the Jews. And perhaps, Judas dreamed of sitting “at His right hand” in that kingdom.
We do not know whether Judas was truly driven by such lofty thoughts – or if he simply loved money too much. But that same “Judas logic” is alive and well today. We see modern-day “apostles,” in Ukraine and beyond, striving to stay close to earthly rulers, basking in the glow of their authority and riches.
We are quick to label as Judases those few clergymen who go over to the OCU. And to some extent, that may be fair. But to be a Judas is not only to betray one’s Church, one’s friends, or one’s parish. First and foremost – it is to betray what Christ Himself taught.
And so, on this Holy Wednesday, we would do well to echo the apostles at the Last Supper and ask ourselves from the depths of our hearts:
“Lord, is it I?”
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.