When a cleric of denomination that served Nazis marches in a victory parade
A UGCC service in the presence of Nazis. Photo: Istorychna Pravda
On May 5, a parade was held in London to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory Day. Among its participants was a group of Ukrainian military personnel accompanied by UGCC chaplain Andriy Khomyshyn.
The official website of the Greek Catholics proudly reported this. Khomyshyn himself told the British media that he was representing "our Ukrainian nation" at the parade.
It all looks quite beautiful. But there's a bit of inconsistency.
Eighty years ago, the UGCC did not represent the Ukrainian nation – it represented only a tiny western fragment of it, some of whose inhabitants fought on the side of Germany. Greek Catholic clerics ministered to soldiers of the SS "Galicia" Division, the "Nachtigall" Battalion, the "Roland" Battalion, and other Nazi formations.
This is not an attempt to tarnish the UGCC; it is an indisputable historical fact. In his 1942 letter to Hitler, the head of the Greek Catholics, Sheptytsky, wrote: “We assure you, Your Excellency, that the leading circles in Ukraine strive for the closest cooperation with Germany, so that with the combined forces of the German and Ukrainian peoples... we may implement a new order in Ukraine and throughout Eastern Europe.”
Of course, Khomyshyn himself may hold different political views. But he is a cleric of the UGCC. And placing a representative of an institution that served the losing side in a Victory Day parade is, at the very least, illogical. At least, that’s how it seems to us.
Read also
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.