Why you shouldn’t put a vyshyvanka on your soul

OCU cleric and SBU officers in vyshyvankas. Photo: SBU

On Vyshyvanka Day, Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) published a photo of the arrest of OCU “priest” and Zoriane village council head Mykhailo Oleinyk, who was caught accepting bribes in a land scheme. Both Oleinyk and the arresting SBU officers were proudly wearing vyshyvankas (embroidered shirts – Ed.). The scene is, at once, comical and sad. Here’s why.

In Ukraine, the vyshyvanka has long ceased to be merely an ethnic garment, like those found in Mexico, Peru, or Norway. Ukrainians are taught that wearing a vyshyvanka connects them to a grand, ancient heritage. It is promoted almost as a sacred “vestment” of a true Ukrainian, the main symbol of “Ukrainian spirituality,” a sign of “light and goodness.”

Children in schools are even asked to write essays on the theme: “Before you put the vyshyvanka on your body, you must put it on your soul.”

Epifaniy Dumenko has claimed that the OCU cannot be imagined without embroidery, suggesting that the colors of the vyshyvanka allegedly carry church symbolism. Thus, only the “worthy,” the true bearers of the “Ukrainian spirit,” are deemed fit to wear it. The “unworthy” are not.

For example, Roman Hryshchuk, a leading church raider in Bukovyna, upon seeing UOC parishioners in vyshyvankas, wrote that their appearance made him not want to wear one anymore. In his view, people who attend the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have no right to wear a vyshyvanka – it should be reserved for the OCU.

Now let us return to Oleinyk and the SBU. This OCU cleric, who also served as a village head, was caught taking bribes as far back as 2016 and has been under investigation ever since. At the time, local OCU “hierarch” Illarion Protsyk said such actions by someone entrusted as a pastor were “unacceptable and inappropriate,” comparing Oleinyk to Judas Iscariot.

Yet despite this, Protsyk has continued to serve liturgies together with this “Judas.” And now Oleinyk has been arrested again – for yet another bribery charge.

But this time, too, Oleinyk was wearing a vyshyvanka.

And the problem isn’t just him or the OCU. On May 15, social media was flooded with grandiose photos of well-fed officials and MPs dressed in vyshyvankas. And it’s doubtful that most of them are any more honest than Oleinyk.

The vyshyvanka is beautiful. It is part of our history. But it is not a “talisman” or a “shield of goodness.” It does not confer some elevated spiritual belonging. It is just clothing.

Christ tells us that this true belonging must be found not on the outside, but within – “The Kingdom of God is within you.”

But that’s hard. It’s easier to just put on a vyshyvanka.

Read also

A hint at a new demographic reality?

It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.