Waiting for the authorities to start swearing at the UOC?
Mykola Tochyskyi. Photo: Tochytskyi's Facebook
In reality, this was just the pretext for a shocking outburst. Speaking about the transfer of the Assumption Cathedral in Kaniv – seized from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) and handed over to the OCU – Tochytskyi claimed the church had been “freed from the parasitism of Moscow clergy.”
That wasn’t all. Referring to the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, he said it should be free of the “Moscow spirit,” and went so far as to declare that “Moscow priests desecrated the Lavra.”
Yes, that’s the Minister of Culture speaking.
He continued: “The process of cleansing Ukraine’s shrines is a priority that requires decisive action – especially since Moscow religious organizations are banned by law.”
Let’s be clear. There are three key points behind this stream of propaganda:
1. The claims of 'destruction' and 'parasitism' are outright lies.
In Kaniv, the UOC community received a semi-ruined church back in 1990 and restored it with their own hands. Now it's being handed over – fully renovated – to the OCU. As for the Lavra, the “museum-run” Upper Lavra is falling apart: peeling walls, collapsing crosses, years without repairs. Meanwhile, the “monastic” Lower Lavra under the UOC is pristine, immaculate. Who’s destroying what again?
2. As a government official, Tochytskyi is supposed to uphold the law – not rewrite it.
The monks of the Lavra are not there illegally; their legal status is currently under review in court. To justify their expulsion with talk of a “ban on Moscow religious organizations” is legally absurd. Has Tochytskyi even read Draft Law 3894? It states that each UOC community must be individually proven to have ties to Moscow before any action can be taken. Until then, all these “Moscow” labels are just smear tactics – slander masquerading as policy.
3. And finally – the Minister of Culture speaks like a street radical.
Calling Ukrainian clergy and faithful “parasites,” using terms like “Moscow priests,” talking about “cleansing” shrines – this isn’t the language of a statesman. It’s the rhetoric of an online agitator.
The previous Minister, Oleksandr Tkachenko, posted images of the Motherland Monument giving the middle finger and proudly supported LGBT campaigns. The current one speaks like a far-right activist Karas.
At this rate, we’re only one step away from hearing open profanity from the Ministry of Culture aimed at the Church.
Read also
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.
Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?
There are numerous traitors and collaborators within the Ministry of Culture, the Verkhovna Rada, and the SBU. Yet for some reason, only the UOC is labeled “pro-Moscow.”