Waiting for the authorities to start swearing at the UOC?

Mykola Tochyskyi. Photo: Tochytskyi's Facebook

In reality, this was just the pretext for a shocking outburst. Speaking about the transfer of the Assumption Cathedral in Kaniv – seized from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) and handed over to the OCU – Tochytskyi claimed the church had been “freed from the parasitism of Moscow clergy.”

That wasn’t all. Referring to the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, he said it should be free of the “Moscow spirit,” and went so far as to declare that “Moscow priests desecrated the Lavra.”

Yes, that’s the Minister of Culture speaking.

He continued: “The process of cleansing Ukraine’s shrines is a priority that requires decisive action – especially since Moscow religious organizations are banned by law.”

Let’s be clear. There are three key points behind this stream of propaganda:

1. The claims of 'destruction' and 'parasitism' are outright lies.
In Kaniv, the UOC community received a semi-ruined church back in 1990 and restored it with their own hands. Now it's being handed over – fully renovated – to the OCU. As for the Lavra, the “museum-run” Upper Lavra is falling apart: peeling walls, collapsing crosses, years without repairs. Meanwhile, the “monastic” Lower Lavra under the UOC is pristine, immaculate. Who’s destroying what again?

2. As a government official, Tochytskyi is supposed to uphold the law – not rewrite it.
The monks of the Lavra are not there illegally; their legal status is currently under review in court. To justify their expulsion with talk of a “ban on Moscow religious organizations” is legally absurd. Has Tochytskyi even read Draft Law 3894? It states that each UOC community must be individually proven to have ties to Moscow before any action can be taken. Until then, all these “Moscow” labels are just smear tactics – slander masquerading as policy.

3. And finally – the Minister of Culture speaks like a street radical.
Calling Ukrainian clergy and faithful “parasites,” using terms like “Moscow priests,” talking about “cleansing” shrines – this isn’t the language of a statesman. It’s the rhetoric of an online agitator.

The previous Minister, Oleksandr Tkachenko, posted images of the Motherland Monument giving the middle finger and proudly supported LGBT campaigns. The current one speaks like a far-right activist Karas.

At this rate, we’re only one step away from hearing open profanity from the Ministry of Culture aimed at the Church.

Read also

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.