Waiting for the authorities to start swearing at the UOC?
Mykola Tochyskyi. Photo: Tochytskyi's Facebook
In reality, this was just the pretext for a shocking outburst. Speaking about the transfer of the Assumption Cathedral in Kaniv – seized from the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) and handed over to the OCU – Tochytskyi claimed the church had been “freed from the parasitism of Moscow clergy.”
That wasn’t all. Referring to the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra, he said it should be free of the “Moscow spirit,” and went so far as to declare that “Moscow priests desecrated the Lavra.”
Yes, that’s the Minister of Culture speaking.
He continued: “The process of cleansing Ukraine’s shrines is a priority that requires decisive action – especially since Moscow religious organizations are banned by law.”
Let’s be clear. There are three key points behind this stream of propaganda:
1. The claims of 'destruction' and 'parasitism' are outright lies.
In Kaniv, the UOC community received a semi-ruined church back in 1990 and restored it with their own hands. Now it's being handed over – fully renovated – to the OCU. As for the Lavra, the “museum-run” Upper Lavra is falling apart: peeling walls, collapsing crosses, years without repairs. Meanwhile, the “monastic” Lower Lavra under the UOC is pristine, immaculate. Who’s destroying what again?
2. As a government official, Tochytskyi is supposed to uphold the law – not rewrite it.
The monks of the Lavra are not there illegally; their legal status is currently under review in court. To justify their expulsion with talk of a “ban on Moscow religious organizations” is legally absurd. Has Tochytskyi even read Draft Law 3894? It states that each UOC community must be individually proven to have ties to Moscow before any action can be taken. Until then, all these “Moscow” labels are just smear tactics – slander masquerading as policy.
3. And finally – the Minister of Culture speaks like a street radical.
Calling Ukrainian clergy and faithful “parasites,” using terms like “Moscow priests,” talking about “cleansing” shrines – this isn’t the language of a statesman. It’s the rhetoric of an online agitator.
The previous Minister, Oleksandr Tkachenko, posted images of the Motherland Monument giving the middle finger and proudly supported LGBT campaigns. The current one speaks like a far-right activist Karas.
At this rate, we’re only one step away from hearing open profanity from the Ministry of Culture aimed at the Church.
Read also
UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount
Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?
Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions
Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?
Can we judge those who joined the OCU from the military commissariat?
There are many known cases where priests and deacons of the UOC, detained by TRC officers, were offered a simple way to secure their release – to switch to the OCU. Most refused.
On Rivne Metropolitan's excuse for service in Jerusalem
If today we consider it possible to make excuses for concelebrating with the ROC, what will we have to justify tomorrow?
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”