A government scenario for communities that managed to expel raiders

A police officer using force against parishioners in Ust-Putyla. Photo: UOJ

Sources in the Bukovynian Ust-Putyla report that on May 27, this tiny village was literally flooded with police. Law enforcers were going door to door checking if men have registered weapons. They also visited the school, where they made it clear to children and teachers that defending their church is not the best idea.

These police actions remind the scenario of events in another Bukovynian village - Verkhni Stanivtsi.

There, let us recall, OCU militants led by Hryshchuk also seized the church, but the UOC community managed to drive them out. In the following days, Stanivtsi was similarly cordoned off by the police, who similarly inquired whether the men had weapons. And when they were convinced that there was no danger of armed confrontation, a demonstrative seizure was carried out. The police pushed back the parishioners, made a corridor for the raiders, and they, breaking down the doors, seized the shrine.

Both Stanivtsi and Ust-Putyla are rare examples where parishioners managed to drive out OCU militants on their own. Such occurrences in religious conflicts are rare. Moreover, it is a precedent that can serve as an example for others. And since the authorities work in tandem with the "state" OCU, they are looking for "anti-crisis" scenarios. In Verkhni Stanivtsi, this scenario worked - the repeated seizure with the help of law enforcement was successful. Obviously, it will be applied in Ust-Putyla as well. Judging by the footage from this village on May 21, where police were actively using force against elderly clerics and parishioners, it is unlikely that law enforcers will show any leniency during a new assault on the church.

Unfortunately, it must be stated that in Bukovyna, the actions of these "guardians of the law" do not quite correspond to the etymology of the word. People to whom the state has given a monopoly on force are using it not for protection or the rule of law. They are using it for the reprisal of one group of Ukrainians against another.

And if the Verkhni Stanivtsi scenario is repeated in Ust-Putyla, it would be more appropriate to call the law enforcers "OCU-enforcers". Unfortunately.

```

Read also

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.