A government scenario for communities that managed to expel raiders
A police officer using force against parishioners in Ust-Putyla. Photo: UOJ
Sources in the Bukovynian Ust-Putyla report that on May 27, this tiny village was literally flooded with police. Law enforcers were going door to door checking if men have registered weapons. They also visited the school, where they made it clear to children and teachers that defending their church is not the best idea.
These police actions remind the scenario of events in another Bukovynian village - Verkhni Stanivtsi.
There, let us recall, OCU militants led by Hryshchuk also seized the church, but the UOC community managed to drive them out. In the following days, Stanivtsi was similarly cordoned off by the police, who similarly inquired whether the men had weapons. And when they were convinced that there was no danger of armed confrontation, a demonstrative seizure was carried out. The police pushed back the parishioners, made a corridor for the raiders, and they, breaking down the doors, seized the shrine.
Both Stanivtsi and Ust-Putyla are rare examples where parishioners managed to drive out OCU militants on their own. Such occurrences in religious conflicts are rare. Moreover, it is a precedent that can serve as an example for others. And since the authorities work in tandem with the "state" OCU, they are looking for "anti-crisis" scenarios. In Verkhni Stanivtsi, this scenario worked - the repeated seizure with the help of law enforcement was successful. Obviously, it will be applied in Ust-Putyla as well. Judging by the footage from this village on May 21, where police were actively using force against elderly clerics and parishioners, it is unlikely that law enforcers will show any leniency during a new assault on the church.
Unfortunately, it must be stated that in Bukovyna, the actions of these "guardians of the law" do not quite correspond to the etymology of the word. People to whom the state has given a monopoly on force are using it not for protection or the rule of law. They are using it for the reprisal of one group of Ukrainians against another.
And if the Verkhni Stanivtsi scenario is repeated in Ust-Putyla, it would be more appropriate to call the law enforcers "OCU-enforcers". Unfortunately.
```
Read also
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.
Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.
Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.
Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?
Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.
Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.