A government scenario for communities that managed to expel raiders

A police officer using force against parishioners in Ust-Putyla. Photo: UOJ

Sources in the Bukovynian Ust-Putyla report that on May 27, this tiny village was literally flooded with police. Law enforcers were going door to door checking if men have registered weapons. They also visited the school, where they made it clear to children and teachers that defending their church is not the best idea.

These police actions remind the scenario of events in another Bukovynian village - Verkhni Stanivtsi.

There, let us recall, OCU militants led by Hryshchuk also seized the church, but the UOC community managed to drive them out. In the following days, Stanivtsi was similarly cordoned off by the police, who similarly inquired whether the men had weapons. And when they were convinced that there was no danger of armed confrontation, a demonstrative seizure was carried out. The police pushed back the parishioners, made a corridor for the raiders, and they, breaking down the doors, seized the shrine.

Both Stanivtsi and Ust-Putyla are rare examples where parishioners managed to drive out OCU militants on their own. Such occurrences in religious conflicts are rare. Moreover, it is a precedent that can serve as an example for others. And since the authorities work in tandem with the "state" OCU, they are looking for "anti-crisis" scenarios. In Verkhni Stanivtsi, this scenario worked - the repeated seizure with the help of law enforcement was successful. Obviously, it will be applied in Ust-Putyla as well. Judging by the footage from this village on May 21, where police were actively using force against elderly clerics and parishioners, it is unlikely that law enforcers will show any leniency during a new assault on the church.

Unfortunately, it must be stated that in Bukovyna, the actions of these "guardians of the law" do not quite correspond to the etymology of the word. People to whom the state has given a monopoly on force are using it not for protection or the rule of law. They are using it for the reprisal of one group of Ukrainians against another.

And if the Verkhni Stanivtsi scenario is repeated in Ust-Putyla, it would be more appropriate to call the law enforcers "OCU-enforcers". Unfortunately.

```

Read also

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.

Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?

There are numerous traitors and collaborators within the Ministry of Culture, the Verkhovna Rada, and the SBU. Yet for some reason, only the UOC is labeled “pro-Moscow.”

On the struggle of Filaret's disciples after his death

After Filaret's death, the OCU intensifies its work to destroy his Kyiv Patriarchate.

Will Zelensky agree that his grandfather was “scum”?

Natalia Pipa is one of the authors of a bill seeking to ban the UOC.