When the main authority for the Church persecutor is Russia

Mykyta Poturaev. Photo: Sokolova's YouTube channel

Poturaev warned that after the courts begin to ban UOC communities, their churches will start being taken away. The authorities will expel parishioners from the Pochaiv, Kyiv-Pechersk Lavras, and all other churches belonging to the state.

But even in those rare cases where temples are privately owned by communities, believers, according to Poturaev, will not be able to pray. Allegedly, "private" churches will be left to the believers, but they will be prohibited from holding services there.

And then comes outright mockery on the verge of sacrilege.

Poturaev suggests (as if jokingly) that UOC parishioners use such churches to store vegetables, trade, or set up casinos (!). Allegedly, so that the premises do not stand idle.

According to him, the faithful will be allowed to pray "somewhere in a house". But even there, they will not be left alone. The "God's Service of Ukraine" (as he "wittily" calls the SBU) will visit them there.

And all this with sarcastic jokes and smirks. The MP relishes every word of humiliation towards UOC believers. To him, they are "an extension of the dirty Kremlin paw". But on what grounds?

At the beginning of the interview, he mentions the recent address of Metropolitan Onuphry with a declaration of the UOC's patriotic position. Poturaev mentioned His Beatitude's theses about praying for the soldiers, condemning the aggression of the RF, breaking ties with the ROC, and so on. But all this does not convince Poturaev, he does not believe it. And here's why.

It turns out that recently the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Lavrov, spoke in defense of the UOC, saying that the Ukrainian authorities have chosen a "course to destroy the Ukrainian Orthodox Church".

According to Poturaev, Lavrov allegedly implied that he considers the UOC Russian (in fact, he did not say this), and thus "set up Onuphry": "Therefore, in fact, there is no faith in all these statements from the UOC if they are so carefully protected by these bastards from across the curb (border)."

At the same time, Poturaev emphasized that the authorities are looking for ties between UOC communities and the ROC (to then ban them) in Russian documents: "Now they are studying them according to the canons of the country that their elder brothers in Moscow are trying to rebuild."

So the logic of Poturaev (and the authorities) is the following: the UOC declares itself Ukrainian, but we do not believe it. We believe Russia, which calls it its own, and therefore we will be guided by its documents.

We want to remind Poturaev that on April 28, the same Lavrov officially called Crimea, the occupied territories of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia regions "Russian". He also urged the whole world to recognize them as Russian.

And the situation here is absolutely identical to the "church" one. And therefore, according to the logic of the collective poturaevs, Ukraine is obliged to immediately recognize these lands as Russian.

Firstly, Lavrov said so.

Secondly, it is written in Russian documents.

Absurd? Absurd. But in the situation with the UOC, no one seems to see it.

Sometimes, observing how our authorities are destroying Ukraine from within, one cannot understand: either their intellectual abilities are so modest, or they are consciously destroying the country in the interests of another state. We think it's the latter.

It's just interesting – for the "idea" or for money?

Read also

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.

Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?

The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.

On sausage and milk during the fast

The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?