Will monks be expelled from Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra on Ascension Day?

The Lower Lavra. Photo: TG channel "Lavra Now"

And this is despite the fact that there are no legal grounds for this. There is an ongoing court battle regarding the eviction of the brethren, and there is no end in sight.

Events around the Lavra are escalating rapidly. On May 22, the Ministry of Culture unexpectedly fired the reserve’s director, Mykola Ostapenko – the very man who had earned “distinguished merit” for his zealous campaign against the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) in the monastery. Since summer 2023, Ostapenko had barred the faithful from entering the monastery, handed over Lower Lavra buildings to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU), and even personally attended court hearings to expel the monks. But apparently, his zeal wasn’t enough. He was dismissed because, in the words of Culture Minister Rostyslav Tochyskyi, “the expected changes to rid the Lavra of the spirit of the Moscow Church have not occurred.”

Then, on May 27, the acting director of the reserve, Ms. Kotliarevska, met with Serhiy Dumenko (a.k.a. “Metropolitan Epifaniy”) at his residence. It’s abundantly clear this meeting was arranged either by the Ministry or by someone even higher up. At this meeting, Dumenko issued instructions – yes, instructions – to Kotliarevska, telling her:

• to “end the groundless presence of representatives of the Moscow Patriarchate in the Reserve’s buildings”;

• to grant the OCU access to the Caves.

It appears an order has been issued from the top: shut the Lavra issue down – and fast. The complete iniquity of this “shutdown,” and how grotesque it will look against the backdrop of Ukraine's portrayal as a “beacon of religious freedom” (try not to laugh), apparently concerns no one anymore.

And a special shout-out to those who keep waxing lyrical about the need for a “dialogue of love” with the OCU. Epifaniy has so much “love” to give, it’s more like a tidal wave – sweeping away everything in its path, including the Lavra.

Read also

Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?

Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?

“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”

Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.