Why Church persecutors are pathetic plagiarists

Francesco Hayez, The Destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem. Photo: Wikipedia

A cynical phrase from MP Poturaev's interview with Lviv media is increasingly spreading around the world, stating that after the ban of the UOC, its churches could be used only as casinos or vegetable storage.

And in the video, it is noticeable that Poturaev is delighted with his own "wit". He clearly considers his "joke" to be something special and unique. But is it really so?

It is known that during the USSR, the churches that the Bolsheviks did not blow up were used for "the needs of the national economy": as warehouses, swimming pools, or cowsheds. But the most common use was placing grain and vegetable storage in the sanctuaries.

So, Poturaev did not come up with anything new. Apparently, "genetic memory" worked. But do not think that this memory is Chekist. No, it goes much deeper.

You will be surprised, but storing vegetables in churches is not at all a Bolshevik innovation. Let us recall the words of Psalm 78: "O God, the nations have come into Your inheritance; they have defiled Your holy temple; they have laid Jerusalem in heaps…"

The conquest of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar and the desecration of the Jerusalem temple occurred more than 2600 years ago. But, as we see, nothing new has been invented since then. Each generation of desecrators simply blatantly plagiarizes their predecessors.

Many Church Fathers expressed thoughts that can be summed up with one well-known phrase: "The devil is the ape of God."

And if Poturaev thinks he is original, he should read recent history. Or open the Psalter.

Read also

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.