On the people’s victory in Chernivtsi
Faithful of the Holy Spirit Cathedral after reclaiming their sanctuary. Photo: UOJ
On June 17 in Chernivtsi, an event took place that many now call “historic.” In a matter of hours, nearly 5,000 parishioners of the cathedral gathered and drove out a handful of thugs who had seized their sacred temple in the name of the OCU. And the word “thugs” is no exaggeration. When men in shorts and balaclavas storm into a church and brutally beat priests – breaking their ribs, smashing their faces – these are not worshippers. Not believers. Not a “religious community.” These are common criminals, and for their crimes, they should have been immediately arrested.
But here lies the tragedy: instead of arresting them, the police sided with them. The authorities protected not the priests and the faithful from the attackers – but the attackers from the faithful. The police did not uphold the law. They shielded those who were brazenly and cynically violating it.
Instead of helping the faithful return to their sanctuary, law enforcement doused them with tear gas, used force, and sided with the raiders at every step. Simply put, the state – through its police – attempted to strip Ukrainian believers of perhaps the last thing they still had left: the right to pray in their own church.
And this is far from the first time. We’ve seen it in Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Cherkasy, and countless other cities and villages. Since the end of 2022, when President Zelensky declared his push for “spiritual independence,” churches have been taken from the faithful in a sweeping, ruthless campaign. And all this while prayer is more vital than ever for Ukrainians – who live under the terror of war. Their homes are shelled, their fathers and brothers are dying at the front, their cities are being wiped off the map.
And they endure.
They endure when displaced persons are offered only words instead of help.
They endure when officials steal from the army, when food prices surpass wages.
They even endure when their loved ones are kidnapped from the streets by military recruiters.
But all patience has its limits. There is a line that must not be crossed.
For a believer, that line is the right to commune with God – not as instructed by the President, his advisors, or his ministers, but as one’s heart calls, as one's ancestors have done for generations.
On June 17 in Chernivtsi, the people showed the government that they still possess freedom. That they still have the right to confess their faith.
Not 10, not 100, not even 500 – but five thousand people came to the cathedral.
And the authorities wavered.
Have we truly reached the day when, to defend our right to pray, we must meet power with resistance?
Is there truly no other way?
Read also
UOC isn’t banned, just ‘de-Russified’? Neither was UGCC under Stalin then
By Shevchuk’s logic, Stalin never banned the UGCC or curtailed freedom of conscience – he merely “freed” the souls of the Uniates from Bandera ideology.
A dip in the Jordan on “one – two – three”
Well-known OCU blogger in “holy orders” Oleksii Filiuk has come up with his own theological formula on the banks of the Jordan. It goes like this: “One – two – three.”
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”