Which articles of the Constitution should we cross out?

A copy of the “improved” Constitution. Photo: Sens Instagram

Ukraine is celebrating Constitution Day. To mark the occasion, the “Sens” bookstore chain has come up with a truly “brilliant” idea: they’re giving away copies of the Constitution with Article 10 crossed out – the one that protects the Russian language.

“Without a doubt, the Constitution of Ukraine is the fundamental law, a symbol of unity and independence. But we must acknowledge that some of its articles need to be revised and updated,” they write in “Sens.”

Some people might call this stunt discriminatory. But let’s be honest – they’re simply telling the truth as they see it: certain constitutional guarantees no longer fit the new Ukrainian reality. And that’s not just about language.

Let’s take a look at Article 35: “Everyone has the right to freedom of religion. This right includes the freedom to profess any religion, to freely perform religious rites and ceremonies alone or in community, and to conduct religious activities.”

Do believers of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church still enjoy that freedom? Can they freely practice their faith? Hardly everywhere. And if things keep going this way, the state will soon rip that freedom away entirely.

Read further: “The Church and religious organizations in Ukraine are separated from the state.” Really? Isn’t the government actively banning the UOC? Doesn’t it expel its communities from churches to hand them over to the OCU? Doesn’t it pressure other Local Churches to recognize its favorite? Doesn’t it treat the OCU as a state “attribute”? The answer is plain: yes.

So here’s our proposal to “Sens”: improve your initiative! Don’t stop at crossing out Article 10 – strike out Article 35 as well. The President will surely approve. After all, his famous “pause” on religious persecution has become a punchline already.

Read also

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.

"I don't celebrate Easter, I'm out of politics"

Unchurched people today are completely disoriented.