Is the anti-UOC propaganda backfiring?
Metropolitan Onufriy and Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: TSN
Some of those surveys literally labeled the UOC as the “Moscow Church” in their questions – poisoning the well right from the start. Others had laughably opaque counting methods. Almost all of them stank of political order-taking. So no one was exactly shocked when those polls showed the OCU enjoying “astronomical” support, while the UOC was supposedly abandoned and despised.
Not to mention the government’s relentless propaganda machine and the OCU’s chorus, which made sure most “non-churchgoing” Ukrainians sincerely believe the UOC is nothing but an “FSB front” and “pro-Kremlin,” and treat it accordingly.
That’s why the results of the latest SOCIS Center poll are a bit of a surprise. Yes, the majority still view the UOC negatively – but the gap has shrunk noticeably.
For example, when asked if the UOC should be liquidated, 34% said yes, but 31% said no. Practically even. And that’s despite the question explicitly calling it the “Moscow Patriarchate.”
A similar picture emerges on the question of whether the UOC should be stripped of state-owned churches it rents: 38% in favor, 28% against. Again, not exactly a landslide.
In the trust rankings, “Moscow’s” Onufriy trails “Kyiv’s” Epifaniy by just 9 percentage points: 10% versus 19%.
And this is after a nonstop media barrage telling Ukrainians that the UOC is in bed with “bloody Kirill,” while the OCU is the shining embodiment of patriotism.
So what’s going on here?
In our view, there are two possible explanations:
It’s a commissioned poll, and the President’s Office decided to ease off the gas pedal in the campaign to eradicate the UOC, realizing that pushing further might blow up in their faces worse than they thought.
It’s a halfway honest poll. In which case, the brutal church seizures and state persecution have produced the opposite of the intended effect – people are starting to see through the lies and realize the propaganda against the UOC is just that: propaganda.
And if it’s the second scenario? Then the peak of that awakening is still ahead.
Read also
Why is it legal to kill a person before birth but not after?
Children are the most privileged members of society. Yet that same society officially permits children to be killed – and on a massive scale.
Honoring the Bolsheviks’ successors at Kyiv Lavra
It was under the Reserve that the relics of the saints were desecrated, Lavra churches were turned into an atheism museum, and toilets were installed in sanctuaries.
"Degenerates" and "stupid animals": anti-UOC activists turn on children
Future historians will wonder how a vast country’s information agenda could have been shaped for so long by people so petty, vicious, and utterly contemptible.
Zelensky sees murder of Polish priest but not of Sviatohirsk monk
Why does Zelensky react so emotionally and swiftly to the murder of a Catholic cleric while remaining completely silent about the murder of an Orthodox monk?
UOC vs. OCU numbers: pollsters count, social media recount
Official polling suggests Dumenko’s structure has an overwhelming lead in the number of parishioners, while social media polls paint a very different picture. Which should we believe?
Who is working for the Kremlin in Poland? OCU, Uniates and Catholics versions
Who in the conflict between Poland and Ukraine is "an agent of the Russian Federation"? Zelensky, who gave the UPA name to an AFU special operations center? Nawrocki, who stripped him of an order for it? Polish MEPs?