Is the anti-UOC propaganda backfiring?
Metropolitan Onufriy and Epifaniy Dumenko. Photo: TSN
Some of those surveys literally labeled the UOC as the “Moscow Church” in their questions – poisoning the well right from the start. Others had laughably opaque counting methods. Almost all of them stank of political order-taking. So no one was exactly shocked when those polls showed the OCU enjoying “astronomical” support, while the UOC was supposedly abandoned and despised.
Not to mention the government’s relentless propaganda machine and the OCU’s chorus, which made sure most “non-churchgoing” Ukrainians sincerely believe the UOC is nothing but an “FSB front” and “pro-Kremlin,” and treat it accordingly.
That’s why the results of the latest SOCIS Center poll are a bit of a surprise. Yes, the majority still view the UOC negatively – but the gap has shrunk noticeably.
For example, when asked if the UOC should be liquidated, 34% said yes, but 31% said no. Practically even. And that’s despite the question explicitly calling it the “Moscow Patriarchate.”
A similar picture emerges on the question of whether the UOC should be stripped of state-owned churches it rents: 38% in favor, 28% against. Again, not exactly a landslide.
In the trust rankings, “Moscow’s” Onufriy trails “Kyiv’s” Epifaniy by just 9 percentage points: 10% versus 19%.
And this is after a nonstop media barrage telling Ukrainians that the UOC is in bed with “bloody Kirill,” while the OCU is the shining embodiment of patriotism.
So what’s going on here?
In our view, there are two possible explanations:
It’s a commissioned poll, and the President’s Office decided to ease off the gas pedal in the campaign to eradicate the UOC, realizing that pushing further might blow up in their faces worse than they thought.
It’s a halfway honest poll. In which case, the brutal church seizures and state persecution have produced the opposite of the intended effect – people are starting to see through the lies and realize the propaganda against the UOC is just that: propaganda.
And if it’s the second scenario? Then the peak of that awakening is still ahead.
Read also
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.
Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent
KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.
Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?
On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.
Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?
The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.
On sausage and milk during the fast
The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?