The UGCC is jumping ship. What will the OCU do?
Shevchuk and Dumenko. Photo: OCU
The head of the Uniates, Shevchuk, actually accused Dumenko's structure of seizing churches and (most importantly), aiming to become a state church. Shortly before this, Shevchuk supported street protests against the authorities, stating that law 12414 against NABU/SAP “undermined the people's trust in the government and the trust of international partners in Ukraine.” There is no doubt that these statements are connected.
The UGCC no longer bets on Zelensky's power. Accordingly, it begins to criticize the OCU for its "state" court status under the current government, and even for violence against the UOC. And there is something to criticize. In the past week, Dumenko has held meetings with 6 (!) ambassadors and diplomats. In fact, the head of the OCU is doing the work of one of the heads of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. As for the seizures of UOC churches by Dumenko's subordinates, there’s plenty of proof.
There is no doubt that the Uniates themselves would like to be in the role of the state church, but Zelensky preferred the OCU. Therefore, Shevchuk is betting on a change of power. Given the strong ties of the Uniates with "international partners" and their experience in organizing the Maidans of 2004 and 2013/2014, the signal for Zelensky and Dumenko is more than serious. It is enough to recall that, according to UGCC Metropolitan Borys Gudziak, half of the protesters on the Euromaidan were Greek Catholics.
It seems that "international partners" have made some decisions regarding the current government, and Shevchuk has become aware of it.
Dumenko and Zoria remain silent and wait. Apparently, they hope that even if the people in the power offices change, the doors to the offices themselves will remain open for them. Obviously, the UGCC also hopes for these doors.
Clearly, the lines of the Psalter "put not your trust in princes, in the sons of men" do not convince the OCU and UGCC leadership. Their priority is the struggle for the status of a "state church." In any case, it seems that neither will support Zelensky.
Read also
"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?
Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?
“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”
Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.
Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent
KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.