Can one preach in a church wearing shorts, flip-flops, and dreadlocks?
OCU Clerics. Collage: UOJ
The main Telegram channel of the OCU published a video of a “priest” and blogger of that structure, Yulian Tymchuk, from the church in Rostoky where he serves. In it, Tymchuk is speaking to children in front of the altar, wearing shorts, a T-shirt, and flip-flops. Yes, this is not a liturgy but merely a missionary meeting. Yet how appropriate is such attire for a clergyman – and that in a church?
After all, even if a random passerby were to wander into church in such a “beach” dress code, they would be asked to come next time in more suitable clothing.
And these words are not an attempt to once again “take a jab” at Epiphany’s clergy. Tymchuk, unlike many of his colleagues, does not seize churches or incite hatred against the UOC, but engages in a useful endeavor. On his Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok channels, he records missionary videos, in which, among other things, he explains to people how to behave in church. Why, then, does he allow himself to stand before the iconostasis in such attire?
Perhaps the answer can be given by another OCU blogger, Oleksandr Dediukhin, who at one point decided to serve in dreadlocks and boasted about it on Facebook. Of course, one might suppose that Dediukhin, by shocking his followers, wanted to spark their curiosity, draw them into the church, and eventually lead them to Christ.
But it seems the matter lies elsewhere. OCU clergy – even the better among them – do not take their ministry seriously; they do not feel the church to be a place of the Holy Spirit’s presence. And this is not our prudish nitpicking.
Even before receiving the Tomos, in 2018, then-President Poroshenko took Dediukhin with him to the Phanar, where they met with Patriarch Bartholomew. Can we imagine Dediukhin going to meet the Patriarch in dreadlocks? We are certain it would have been impossible – it would have caused a scandal. But why is it that for a meeting with Bartholomew Dediukhin will not allow himself dreadlocks, yet for a meeting with God – no problem? The same applies to Yulian Tymchuk. If he were invited to the Phanar, we can be absolutely sure he would not go there in shorts, a T-shirt, and flip-flops.
Every time one watches the OCU clergy seize yet another church with hatred and violence, only to immediately drop to their knees before the altar to “pray,” one cannot shake the feeling that they are playing some sort of game – that they do not feel the sacredness of the church space, do not believe that they stand under the gaze of the Creator of the universe.
And it seems that clergy in shorts and with dreadlocks do not believe either.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.