Can one preach in a church wearing shorts, flip-flops, and dreadlocks?

OCU Clerics. Collage: UOJ

The main Telegram channel of the OCU published a video of a “priest” and blogger of that structure, Yulian Tymchuk, from the church in Rostoky where he serves. In it, Tymchuk is speaking to children in front of the altar, wearing shorts, a T-shirt, and flip-flops. Yes, this is not a liturgy but merely a missionary meeting. Yet how appropriate is such attire for a clergyman – and that in a church?

After all, even if a random passerby were to wander into church in such a “beach” dress code, they would be asked to come next time in more suitable clothing.

And these words are not an attempt to once again “take a jab” at Epiphany’s clergy. Tymchuk, unlike many of his colleagues, does not seize churches or incite hatred against the UOC, but engages in a useful endeavor. On his Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok channels, he records missionary videos, in which, among other things, he explains to people how to behave in church. Why, then, does he allow himself to stand before the iconostasis in such attire?

Perhaps the answer can be given by another OCU blogger, Oleksandr Dediukhin, who at one point decided to serve in dreadlocks and boasted about it on Facebook. Of course, one might suppose that Dediukhin, by shocking his followers, wanted to spark their curiosity, draw them into the church, and eventually lead them to Christ.

But it seems the matter lies elsewhere. OCU clergy – even the better among them – do not take their ministry seriously; they do not feel the church to be a place of the Holy Spirit’s presence. And this is not our prudish nitpicking.

Even before receiving the Tomos, in 2018, then-President Poroshenko took Dediukhin with him to the Phanar, where they met with Patriarch Bartholomew. Can we imagine Dediukhin going to meet the Patriarch in dreadlocks? We are certain it would have been impossible – it would have caused a scandal. But why is it that for a meeting with Bartholomew Dediukhin will not allow himself dreadlocks, yet for a meeting with God – no problem? The same applies to Yulian Tymchuk. If he were invited to the Phanar, we can be absolutely sure he would not go there in shorts, a T-shirt, and flip-flops.

Every time one watches the OCU clergy seize yet another church with hatred and violence, only to immediately drop to their knees before the altar to “pray,” one cannot shake the feeling that they are playing some sort of game – that they do not feel the sacredness of the church space, do not believe that they stand under the gaze of the Creator of the universe.

And it seems that clergy in shorts and with dreadlocks do not believe either.

Read also

Refuse to endure no power and heat? You’re an "FSB-MP agent"

Khmelnytskyi authorities have labeled as "parishioners of the Mosparchate (Moscow Patriarchate - Ed.)" everyone who is dissatisfied with power cuts.

Why are no cases opened against the Reserve for totalitarianism propaganda?

The current "Ukrainian" Reserve differs from the Soviet one only in the change of state symbols.

On the government's failure on American "religious track"

Apparently, the Ukrainian authorities are suffering a crushing defeat on the "religious track" in the United States.

Can a Christian betray?

A court case is now underway against Yulia Tymoshenko. She is accused of buying members of parliament’s votes when decisions and laws were adopted in the Verkhovna Rada.

Remember this, Ukrainian – all your troubles are blamed on Orthodox schools

Our media have long been engaged in loud incitement of hatred toward people who harm no one at all. And, strangely enough, this always seems to coincide with scandals around thieves in high offices.

Should the law banning the UOC be repealed?

It turns out that MPs from Batkivshchyna were taking money for “the right” votes. Could the vote for the law banning the UOC also have been “bought”?