OCU and Poland: Is Bandera still “our father” – or not anymore?

Epifaniy and OUN flags in Lviv. Photo: OCU

Just the other day, 57 Ukrainians were deported from the country for waving red-and-black flags, and Nawrocki called the Banderites “murderers and perverts,” stressing that they killed more than 120,000 people. He announced that Poland is preparing a law under which public statements in favor of the OUN or displays of its symbols will carry criminal liability.

Against this backdrop, it is interesting to consider how relations between the OCU and the Poles will now develop. Until recently, Polish authorities, thanks to their close ties with the Ukrainian government, treated Dumenko’s organization with a certain goodwill. Ukrainian diplomats, for their part, had used Poland as a channel to pressure the Polish Church, trying to push it toward recognizing the OCU.

But now it is worth recalling Dumenko’s own position – and that of his fellow “hierarchs” – toward Bandera and the OUN–UPA. In short, it has been one of outright endorsement.

Epiphany has publicly stated that the OCU considers itself “Banderite” and is proud of it. The OCU has signed cooperation memoranda with OUN affiliates, Dumenko’s clergy have sung the song “Our Father is Bandera” in large numbers, and so forth.

We do not yet know whether the Poles are determined to fully criminalize the OUN, but if they are, Dumenko and his colleagues could soon find themselves personae non gratae in that country.

Moreover, given Poland’s current importance to Ukraine, Warsaw could well demand that Kyiv reconsider its official support for Banderite ideology.

It is clear enough that all of Epifaniy’s “Banderite” rhetoric was aimed at pleasing those in power, politicians, and “Ukrainian society” – to ensure that both he and his structure would be seen as “one of us.” And he surely knew that, from a Christian perspective, the OUN’s reputation is, to put it mildly, far from spotless.

This is what always happens when a man in a cassock lays aside the Gospel and tries to fit himself into the political agenda. At first, everything seems fine – you’re in the current, in the trend. But then the trend shifts, and you’re left looking a fool.

For the time being, everything seems fine for Epifaniy, though the harbingers of trouble are in the air.

Read also

Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?

In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.

Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed

The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.

Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money

While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.

Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?

No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.

Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?

If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?

How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"

From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.