OCU and Poland: Is Bandera still “our father” – or not anymore?

Epifaniy and OUN flags in Lviv. Photo: OCU

Just the other day, 57 Ukrainians were deported from the country for waving red-and-black flags, and Nawrocki called the Banderites “murderers and perverts,” stressing that they killed more than 120,000 people. He announced that Poland is preparing a law under which public statements in favor of the OUN or displays of its symbols will carry criminal liability.

Against this backdrop, it is interesting to consider how relations between the OCU and the Poles will now develop. Until recently, Polish authorities, thanks to their close ties with the Ukrainian government, treated Dumenko’s organization with a certain goodwill. Ukrainian diplomats, for their part, had used Poland as a channel to pressure the Polish Church, trying to push it toward recognizing the OCU.

But now it is worth recalling Dumenko’s own position – and that of his fellow “hierarchs” – toward Bandera and the OUN–UPA. In short, it has been one of outright endorsement.

Epiphany has publicly stated that the OCU considers itself “Banderite” and is proud of it. The OCU has signed cooperation memoranda with OUN affiliates, Dumenko’s clergy have sung the song “Our Father is Bandera” in large numbers, and so forth.

We do not yet know whether the Poles are determined to fully criminalize the OUN, but if they are, Dumenko and his colleagues could soon find themselves personae non gratae in that country.

Moreover, given Poland’s current importance to Ukraine, Warsaw could well demand that Kyiv reconsider its official support for Banderite ideology.

It is clear enough that all of Epifaniy’s “Banderite” rhetoric was aimed at pleasing those in power, politicians, and “Ukrainian society” – to ensure that both he and his structure would be seen as “one of us.” And he surely knew that, from a Christian perspective, the OUN’s reputation is, to put it mildly, far from spotless.

This is what always happens when a man in a cassock lays aside the Gospel and tries to fit himself into the political agenda. At first, everything seems fine – you’re in the current, in the trend. But then the trend shifts, and you’re left looking a fool.

For the time being, everything seems fine for Epifaniy, though the harbingers of trouble are in the air.

Read also

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.

Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?

38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.

Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent

KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.

Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?

On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.

Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?

The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.

On sausage and milk during the fast

The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?