OCU and Poland: Is Bandera still “our father” – or not anymore?
Epifaniy and OUN flags in Lviv. Photo: OCU
Just the other day, 57 Ukrainians were deported from the country for waving red-and-black flags, and Nawrocki called the Banderites “murderers and perverts,” stressing that they killed more than 120,000 people. He announced that Poland is preparing a law under which public statements in favor of the OUN or displays of its symbols will carry criminal liability.
Against this backdrop, it is interesting to consider how relations between the OCU and the Poles will now develop. Until recently, Polish authorities, thanks to their close ties with the Ukrainian government, treated Dumenko’s organization with a certain goodwill. Ukrainian diplomats, for their part, had used Poland as a channel to pressure the Polish Church, trying to push it toward recognizing the OCU.
But now it is worth recalling Dumenko’s own position – and that of his fellow “hierarchs” – toward Bandera and the OUN–UPA. In short, it has been one of outright endorsement.
Epiphany has publicly stated that the OCU considers itself “Banderite” and is proud of it. The OCU has signed cooperation memoranda with OUN affiliates, Dumenko’s clergy have sung the song “Our Father is Bandera” in large numbers, and so forth.
We do not yet know whether the Poles are determined to fully criminalize the OUN, but if they are, Dumenko and his colleagues could soon find themselves personae non gratae in that country.
Moreover, given Poland’s current importance to Ukraine, Warsaw could well demand that Kyiv reconsider its official support for Banderite ideology.
It is clear enough that all of Epifaniy’s “Banderite” rhetoric was aimed at pleasing those in power, politicians, and “Ukrainian society” – to ensure that both he and his structure would be seen as “one of us.” And he surely knew that, from a Christian perspective, the OUN’s reputation is, to put it mildly, far from spotless.
This is what always happens when a man in a cassock lays aside the Gospel and tries to fit himself into the political agenda. At first, everything seems fine – you’re in the current, in the trend. But then the trend shifts, and you’re left looking a fool.
For the time being, everything seems fine for Epifaniy, though the harbingers of trouble are in the air.
Read also
When every UOC church in Lviv Region is shut down – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Galicia, the authorities have effectively outlawed the UOC and are hunting down “underground” services – while in the United States they solemnly insist that no one in Ukraine is persecuted for their faith.
Why Epifaniy’s “piety” justifies Patriarch Bartholomew’s hopes
The Phanar is convinced that Dumenko “stands firmly and unshakably on spiritual heights.”
Dumenko’s “dialogue” appeal to the UOC: sincerity or strategy?
If the OCU truly wanted dialogue, it would decide to halt seizures and return what was taken.
Where did the circus go? It was here just yesterday
At an Orthodox Church of Ukraine “service” with Epifaniy (Dumenko) in the seized cathedral in Volodymyr, there are people. But the very next day – without Epifaniy – there are no people.
Why instigators of hatred against the UOC should be in prison
Churches were not built for one state to defeat another, not for the triumph of an “Ukrainian spirit,” and not for the “spirit” of any other nation.
Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?
Fierce battles are being waged on social media and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.