OCU and Poland: Is Bandera still “our father” – or not anymore?

Epifaniy and OUN flags in Lviv. Photo: OCU

Just the other day, 57 Ukrainians were deported from the country for waving red-and-black flags, and Nawrocki called the Banderites “murderers and perverts,” stressing that they killed more than 120,000 people. He announced that Poland is preparing a law under which public statements in favor of the OUN or displays of its symbols will carry criminal liability.

Against this backdrop, it is interesting to consider how relations between the OCU and the Poles will now develop. Until recently, Polish authorities, thanks to their close ties with the Ukrainian government, treated Dumenko’s organization with a certain goodwill. Ukrainian diplomats, for their part, had used Poland as a channel to pressure the Polish Church, trying to push it toward recognizing the OCU.

But now it is worth recalling Dumenko’s own position – and that of his fellow “hierarchs” – toward Bandera and the OUN–UPA. In short, it has been one of outright endorsement.

Epiphany has publicly stated that the OCU considers itself “Banderite” and is proud of it. The OCU has signed cooperation memoranda with OUN affiliates, Dumenko’s clergy have sung the song “Our Father is Bandera” in large numbers, and so forth.

We do not yet know whether the Poles are determined to fully criminalize the OUN, but if they are, Dumenko and his colleagues could soon find themselves personae non gratae in that country.

Moreover, given Poland’s current importance to Ukraine, Warsaw could well demand that Kyiv reconsider its official support for Banderite ideology.

It is clear enough that all of Epifaniy’s “Banderite” rhetoric was aimed at pleasing those in power, politicians, and “Ukrainian society” – to ensure that both he and his structure would be seen as “one of us.” And he surely knew that, from a Christian perspective, the OUN’s reputation is, to put it mildly, far from spotless.

This is what always happens when a man in a cassock lays aside the Gospel and tries to fit himself into the political agenda. At first, everything seems fine – you’re in the current, in the trend. But then the trend shifts, and you’re left looking a fool.

For the time being, everything seems fine for Epifaniy, though the harbingers of trouble are in the air.

Read also

Nerves on edge: Why DESS is going after UOC's lawyers

The DESS lawsuit against the Kyiv Metropolia is not unfolding the way Viktor Yelensky had hoped.

FSB officer faces charges – and an inconvenient detail from his past

Ten years after the Great Cross Procession: faith through trial

Ten years ago, nearly 100,000 faithful filled the streets of Kyiv. Today, the Lavra has been taken away, religious processions have been all but banned, and the Church faces persecution.

Clergy “busification,” or the routine genocide of Orthodox priests

The video of masked men grabbing a priest by his arms and legs and throwing him into a van shocked many people. It was the first time we had seen a clergyman treated this way with our own eyes.

Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue

Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.

Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them

The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.