OCU and Poland: Is Bandera still “our father” – or not anymore?
Epifaniy and OUN flags in Lviv. Photo: OCU
Just the other day, 57 Ukrainians were deported from the country for waving red-and-black flags, and Nawrocki called the Banderites “murderers and perverts,” stressing that they killed more than 120,000 people. He announced that Poland is preparing a law under which public statements in favor of the OUN or displays of its symbols will carry criminal liability.
Against this backdrop, it is interesting to consider how relations between the OCU and the Poles will now develop. Until recently, Polish authorities, thanks to their close ties with the Ukrainian government, treated Dumenko’s organization with a certain goodwill. Ukrainian diplomats, for their part, had used Poland as a channel to pressure the Polish Church, trying to push it toward recognizing the OCU.
But now it is worth recalling Dumenko’s own position – and that of his fellow “hierarchs” – toward Bandera and the OUN–UPA. In short, it has been one of outright endorsement.
Epiphany has publicly stated that the OCU considers itself “Banderite” and is proud of it. The OCU has signed cooperation memoranda with OUN affiliates, Dumenko’s clergy have sung the song “Our Father is Bandera” in large numbers, and so forth.
We do not yet know whether the Poles are determined to fully criminalize the OUN, but if they are, Dumenko and his colleagues could soon find themselves personae non gratae in that country.
Moreover, given Poland’s current importance to Ukraine, Warsaw could well demand that Kyiv reconsider its official support for Banderite ideology.
It is clear enough that all of Epifaniy’s “Banderite” rhetoric was aimed at pleasing those in power, politicians, and “Ukrainian society” – to ensure that both he and his structure would be seen as “one of us.” And he surely knew that, from a Christian perspective, the OUN’s reputation is, to put it mildly, far from spotless.
This is what always happens when a man in a cassock lays aside the Gospel and tries to fit himself into the political agenda. At first, everything seems fine – you’re in the current, in the trend. But then the trend shifts, and you’re left looking a fool.
For the time being, everything seems fine for Epifaniy, though the harbingers of trouble are in the air.
Read also
Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?
The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.
On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group
The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.
Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?
Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?
The UOC and the end of the Yermak era
The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.
On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”
A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.
Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan
“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.