Does the state now decide who is depicted on church frescoes?
Frescoes in the Dormition Cathedral. Photo: Ukrinform
First came the photos and videos of reserve staff hauling the reliquaries with the relics of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves out of the catacombs and performing strange manipulations with them. Then followed an image showing those same reliquaries dumped on the floor in some corridor, alongside banana crates and half-finished coffee cups.
And now, the head of the reserve, Kotliarevska, has made a shocking announcement: as part of “derussification,” a number of frescoes in the Dormition Cathedral will be destroyed and replaced with new ones. She made it clear that the “derussification” would target frescoes depicting Metropolitan Onuphry, the late Metropolitan Volodymyr (the reposed primate of the UOC), and the Lavra’s abbot, Metropolitan Pavel. We will not ask what connection these hierarchs – all of them ethnic Ukrainians – are supposed to have with Russia. Let us note something else.
According to Kotliarevska, it will be a “scientific council” that decides who exactly will be painted on the frescoes of the Dormition Cathedral. In other words, people with no relation to the Church whatsoever.
First the museum workers rummage through the reliquaries of the Venerable Fathers, and now they presume to dictate how the churches should be painted. What comes next? Will the Ministry of Culture staff appoint whom to canonize and whom not? Will they instruct the Church whom to commemorate at the Great Entrance?
Although, one suspects that for Dumenko, as for the Ministry of Culture, the answer will always be nothing but a resounding “yes.”
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.