When the judge is friends with one side – against the other
Yelensky, Stefanchuk, and Dumenko at the same table. Photo: OCU press service
On August 27, the head of the State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Viktor Yelensky, signed a decree recognizing the affiliation of the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC with Moscow, paving the way for its ban. Just a couple of days before that, on August 25, Yelensky dined at the same table with the head of the Rada, Stefanchuk, and the head of the OCU, Serhiy Dumenko. Coincidence?
In the judicial system, any connections of a judge with one of the parties are an unconditional basis for recusal. Friendly contacts, public statements, even simple communication make a judge's participation in the consideration of a case impossible. Especially if there is personal interest involved. A judge in a property dispute cannot publicly call for the transfer of assets from one party to another.
In football, it's the same. A referee whose nationality matches one of the participants in an international match is never appointed.
Today, Yelensky and Stefanchuk are like judges for the UOC, deciding its fate. But over the past 10 years, Yelensky has made numerous statements expressing negative views on the UOC. At the same time, he actively supports the OCU and does not hide the fact that banning the UOC would greatly benefit Dumenko's organization. This is a clear case of blatant bias on the part of an official holding a high state position.
Of course, against the backdrop of everything happening in the church field, a shared dinner may seem like a minor detail. Anyway, is this really how things are supposed to work in a democratic state? Are we expected to believe in “justice” toward the UOC after this?
Read also
The UGCC “сan survive persecution” – unless it happens to someone else
The current situation surrounding the UOC is no different from what the Uniates themselves experienced after the Lviv Council.
Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.
The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon
According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.