When you are a “bishop” in the OCU, but your family remains in the Church

"Bishop" of the OCU Havyiil Kryzyna. Photo: Kryzyna’s Facebook

The news that the mother of “Bishop” of the OCU Havyiil (Kryzyna) took the great schema in a UOC monastery (having earlier received the lesser schema there) became one of the most-read stories on the UOJ website. And no wonder – the case is truly extraordinary.

Even more unusual is that Kryzyna himself wrote about it on Facebook, justifying it by claiming that “the UOC MP is close to the OCU.”

The comments exploded into a veritable battlefield. Some reproach the “bishop” for failing to explain to his mother the error of staying in the “Moscow Church.” Others demand she be transferred into an OCU monastery. Still others ask, quite logically, whether his mother even recognizes her son’s episcopal rank.

But what puzzled everyone most was why Kryzyna made public such information, so awkward and shameful for the OCU.

And perhaps the most truthful explanation was voiced in the words of commenter Slava Sheremet: “Most likely, something terrible and painful is happening inside him, and he is in need of support and advice.”

We have seen more than once that people in “holy orders” (first in the UOC-KP and UAOC, and later in the OCU) treat their position there as a job. It provides income, social standing, and the support of the authorities. But in matters of the soul they still look toward the “FSB-controlled” Church.

Havyiil Kryzyna had been an archimandrite in the UOC, but he longed to become a bishop. And so, when he learned of the plans to create the OCU in 2018, he swiftly crossed over to the UAOC, received the “episcopal” rank there, and very soon became the ruling “bishop” of the Rivne-Volyn Eparchy of the OCU. But did that make him any happier?

Neither his parents nor his sister supported him. And it is evident that “Bishop Havyiil,” as a man who still has faith, is deeply troubled by this. He knows what he ought to do. But such a step demands spiritual strength. And for now, Fr. Havyiil does not have it.

Read also

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.