What is happening with the relics of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves?
Relics of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves. Photo: Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra website
Lately there has been much talk surrounding the relics of the Venerable Fathers. After the scandal with footage showing a museum employee poking around in a reliquary, several loud statements appeared in the media. For instance, MP Dubinsky claimed that the authorities were planning to send part of the relics to England. More recently, a screenshot circulated online, allegedly from the Facebook page of “Metropolitan” Dmytro Rudiuk of the OCU, claiming the relics would be transferred to the St. George’s Cathedral of the UGCC in Lviv. Yet the fact that no such post exists on Rudiuk’s page, along with obvious mistakes in the text (“… незалежно від того, який обряд вони дотримуються”), clearly shows this to be a fake.
So what remains once the noise is stripped away?
Here is what is known for certain at this moment:
1. Reserve staff were indeed carrying out manipulations with the relics of the Venerable Fathers. This was confirmed by Director S. Kotliarevska. According to her, “the Reserve worked with the reliquaries (coffins) and the cloths.” On August 28, “the set of measures for the preservation of the reliquaries with the holy relics of the Venerable Fathers was completed.”
2. In these manipulations with the relics, the Reserve cooperated with representatives of the OCU, who “in constant prayer and in accordance with all canons carried out the full range of necessary actions precisely with the holy relics.” What this “full range of necessary actions” consisted of, we can only guess.
One curious detail: all members of the OCU in the Lavra are at the same time employees of the Reserve (on this basis they are allowed to reside in the Lavra). Yet even so, the authorities did not entrust them with “working with the reliquaries and cloths.”
3. Back in March, the Ministry of Culture established a commission to study the relics of the Venerable Fathers, the results of which have been classified. It is known that specialists in biology and veterinary science “worked” with the reliquaries. In response to an inquiry from the Lavra’s lawyers, the Ministry stated that the relics had been subjected to “tests” by the microbiological laboratory of Sumy State University “Ekomedkhim.” What kind of “tests” these were, the Ministry refused to answer, citing a secrecy clause.
Conclusions: We do not know for certain whether all the relics of the Venerable Fathers still remain in the Lavra, for the state still bars us from access to the shrines. But what is beyond doubt is that the authorities’ actions toward the relics are an act of sacrilege. “Tests” by microbiologists and veterinarians, “reclothing” performed by laypeople, reliquaries stored in warehouses alongside random boxes – all this is a carbon copy of the practices of the godless Soviet authorities.
Why is this happening?
In a comment to the UOJ, one of the Lavra’s clergymen admitted that God has allowed the effective seizure of the Lavra and its relics because of our own unrighteousness.
“If we truly struggled with our passions instead of excusing them, no museum worker would have dared to touch the relics. But because our prayer is weak, our fasting nonexistent, and a whole bouquet of passions flourishes, the Lord has once again allowed the relics of His saints to be subjected to desecration,” said the archimandrite.
And he was speaking only of the brotherhood. Yet the Lavra and the relics of the Venerable Fathers of the Caves are the heritage of our whole Church. Therefore we all bear responsibility for what is happening now. It is we who did not struggle with our passions. It is our prayer that is weak. It is our fasting that is “nonexistent.”
And the situation in the Lavra will change only when we ourselves change.
Read also
Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.
The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon
According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.
On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have
Trust in the Razumkov Center's research methods on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.