Patriarch Bartholomew: Despite the Tomos, Ukrainians must unite once again

Patriarch Bartholomew. Photo: French television

The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople gave a landmark interview to French television. At first glance, his stance on Ukraine seemed unchanged – he refused to revoke the Tomos. Yet much in his tone and message has indeed shifted.

1️⃣. Whereas he once declared that the OCU had united all Orthodox Ukrainians, for the first time he publicly admitted that the Tomos brought no unity. He did not dispute the interviewer’s statement that two parallel jurisdictions exist in Ukraine – the UOC and the OCU.

2️⃣. In 2019, Patriarch Bartholomew officially stated that he was “temporarily tolerating the existence of Ukrainian hierarchs (i.e. the UOC – Ed.) not as ruling bishops, but merely as titulars, or as hierarchs of the Russian Church residing in Ukraine.” Now he effectively acknowledges that the UOC, under Metropolitan Onuphry, truly exists. Consequently, both its Primate and all its bishops are no mere “titulars.”

3️⃣. In a statement that borders on irony, the Patriarch proclaimed a new “goal” for Constantinople in Ukraine: “Our goal is to unite all the Orthodox Churches of Ukraine: both Metropolitan Onuphry and Metropolitan Epiphany, so that they may be united not only in theory, but in practice.”

4️⃣. Most striking of all: Bartholomew now speaks of recognition of Ukrainian autocephaly by the Local Churches not in the context of the OCU, but of some future united Church comprising both the UOC and the OCU.

And whereas the Phanar initially claimed that recognition would take only months, the Patriarch now speaks in the language of decades: “I believe that with God’s grace and the goodwill of the sister Orthodox Churches, this will happen in the coming years or decades.”

The one point on which Bartholomew remains unyielding is his claim to the status of “first without equals.” Neither he nor his successors, he insists, will ever renounce their command over Orthodoxy.

Read also

A hint at a new demographic reality?

It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.