Patriarch Bartholomew: Despite the Tomos, Ukrainians must unite once again
Patriarch Bartholomew. Photo: French television
The Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople gave a landmark interview to French television. At first glance, his stance on Ukraine seemed unchanged – he refused to revoke the Tomos. Yet much in his tone and message has indeed shifted.
1️⃣. Whereas he once declared that the OCU had united all Orthodox Ukrainians, for the first time he publicly admitted that the Tomos brought no unity. He did not dispute the interviewer’s statement that two parallel jurisdictions exist in Ukraine – the UOC and the OCU.
2️⃣. In 2019, Patriarch Bartholomew officially stated that he was “temporarily tolerating the existence of Ukrainian hierarchs (i.e. the UOC – Ed.) not as ruling bishops, but merely as titulars, or as hierarchs of the Russian Church residing in Ukraine.” Now he effectively acknowledges that the UOC, under Metropolitan Onuphry, truly exists. Consequently, both its Primate and all its bishops are no mere “titulars.”
3️⃣. In a statement that borders on irony, the Patriarch proclaimed a new “goal” for Constantinople in Ukraine: “Our goal is to unite all the Orthodox Churches of Ukraine: both Metropolitan Onuphry and Metropolitan Epiphany, so that they may be united not only in theory, but in practice.”
4️⃣. Most striking of all: Bartholomew now speaks of recognition of Ukrainian autocephaly by the Local Churches not in the context of the OCU, but of some future united Church comprising both the UOC and the OCU.
And whereas the Phanar initially claimed that recognition would take only months, the Patriarch now speaks in the language of decades: “I believe that with God’s grace and the goodwill of the sister Orthodox Churches, this will happen in the coming years or decades.”
The one point on which Bartholomew remains unyielding is his claim to the status of “first without equals.” Neither he nor his successors, he insists, will ever renounce their command over Orthodoxy.
Read also
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.
Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.
Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.
Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?
Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.
Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.