Where have the Christian leaders’ consciences gone?

“Christian leaders.” Photo: OCU press service

In an interview with American Christian journalist Joel Rosenberg, Zelensky once again poured out a stream of manipulation and falsehoods about the UOC.

In particular, he “refuted” Tucker Carlson’s words that in Ukraine the authorities are imprisoning priests and closing churches.

Zelensky labels the UOC a “Russian Church” and insists that none of its representatives have been persecuted. According to him, the law banning the UOC is “not about persecution or the closure of any particular Church.”

Yet Metropolitan Arseny has languished in prison for a year and a half; blood was spilled in Cherkasy and Chernivtsi; 2,000 churches were forcibly “transferred”; UOC communities now serve liturgy in private homes – and all of this, according to Zelensky, is supposedly “not persecution.”

But the point is not Zelensky. With him everything is already clear. To expect truth or justice from him is senseless. The issue lies elsewhere – or rather, with others.

At the beginning of the interview Rosenberg mentioned that he had spoken “with Christian leaders,” and they told him that Carlson’s words about UOC persecution were false.

“Could you clarify this issue of religious freedom? Because Christians I meet with at very high levels say this is the freest country for their faith among all the former Soviet republics,” he asked Zelensky.

We already know how Zelensky answered. What we do not know is this: where have the consciences of these so-called “Christian leaders” gone? Instead of helping their persecuted brothers in the UOC, they act in ways that only intensify the persecution.

Perhaps they do indeed follow another Christ altogether?

Read also

A hint at a new demographic reality?

It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.