Whom should UOC parishioners believe: the “good” cop or the “bad” one?
Has the government prepared to shutter churches? Photo: UOJ
DESS deputy head Viktor Voynalovych stated that as a result of liquidating UOC structures, the government will not close churches, and parishioners will not suffer in the least.
“We are not talking about closing churches, we are not talking about halting any religious activity or holding services in churches. It is not about closing a church – absolutely not,” Voynalovych assures.
And then one recalls the remarks made back in the spring by MP Mykyta Poturayev, chair of Parliament’s Committee on Humanitarian and Information Policy, regarding the consequences of banning the UOC.
According to him, if churches or other property are owned by the state, UOC communities will be driven out. Moreover, even in those rare cases when a church is privately owned, services there will be prohibited.
“It may remain with them – private property is inviolable here. But otherwise – sure, let them store vegetables there, trade goods, I don’t know, open a casino – that’s their business, it’s their private property. They just won’t be able to use it to glorify their Gundiayev,” the MP said mockingly.
As we can see, two diametrically opposed statements from officials. So whom should we believe?
Once upon a time, the current mayor of Dnipro, Borys Filatov, became famous for this line: “One must give scum any promises, guarantees, and make any concessions. … And hang them… Hang them later.”
It seems wise to view Voynalovych’s assurances precisely in this light.
Read also
On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra
After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.
You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?
The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?
Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”
Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.
OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir
Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”
Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about
Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.
Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?
The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.