Whom should UOC parishioners believe: the “good” cop or the “bad” one?
Has the government prepared to shutter churches? Photo: UOJ
DESS deputy head Viktor Voynalovych stated that as a result of liquidating UOC structures, the government will not close churches, and parishioners will not suffer in the least.
“We are not talking about closing churches, we are not talking about halting any religious activity or holding services in churches. It is not about closing a church – absolutely not,” Voynalovych assures.
And then one recalls the remarks made back in the spring by MP Mykyta Poturayev, chair of Parliament’s Committee on Humanitarian and Information Policy, regarding the consequences of banning the UOC.
According to him, if churches or other property are owned by the state, UOC communities will be driven out. Moreover, even in those rare cases when a church is privately owned, services there will be prohibited.
“It may remain with them – private property is inviolable here. But otherwise – sure, let them store vegetables there, trade goods, I don’t know, open a casino – that’s their business, it’s their private property. They just won’t be able to use it to glorify their Gundiayev,” the MP said mockingly.
As we can see, two diametrically opposed statements from officials. So whom should we believe?
Once upon a time, the current mayor of Dnipro, Borys Filatov, became famous for this line: “One must give scum any promises, guarantees, and make any concessions. … And hang them… Hang them later.”
It seems wise to view Voynalovych’s assurances precisely in this light.
Read also
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.
Ukraine’s court religions: conscience or LGBT?
“Moscow priests” will be branded not only for refusing to join the OCU and for following the Julian calendar, but also for “homophobia.”
Does Patriarch Bartholomew consider Ukrainians bearers of the "Russian World"?
The Primate of the Church of Constantinople arrived in Vilnius to introduce the newly appointed Exarch of Lithuania, Bishop Panaretos of Tamasos.
A lesson for the modern Church from the depths of ages
St. Leontius had no desire whatsoever to be “one of their own” for the local authorities or non-believers.
How the UOC Council in Feofania was turned into a “lawless gathering”
All the insults hurled at the Council – claims that it was a “mob gathering,” “filth,” “foam,” and the like – rest not on canons or facts, but solely on the emotions of those making them.