Whom should UOC parishioners believe: the “good” cop or the “bad” one?
Has the government prepared to shutter churches? Photo: UOJ
DESS deputy head Viktor Voynalovych stated that as a result of liquidating UOC structures, the government will not close churches, and parishioners will not suffer in the least.
“We are not talking about closing churches, we are not talking about halting any religious activity or holding services in churches. It is not about closing a church – absolutely not,” Voynalovych assures.
And then one recalls the remarks made back in the spring by MP Mykyta Poturayev, chair of Parliament’s Committee on Humanitarian and Information Policy, regarding the consequences of banning the UOC.
According to him, if churches or other property are owned by the state, UOC communities will be driven out. Moreover, even in those rare cases when a church is privately owned, services there will be prohibited.
“It may remain with them – private property is inviolable here. But otherwise – sure, let them store vegetables there, trade goods, I don’t know, open a casino – that’s their business, it’s their private property. They just won’t be able to use it to glorify their Gundiayev,” the MP said mockingly.
As we can see, two diametrically opposed statements from officials. So whom should we believe?
Once upon a time, the current mayor of Dnipro, Borys Filatov, became famous for this line: “One must give scum any promises, guarantees, and make any concessions. … And hang them… Hang them later.”
It seems wise to view Voynalovych’s assurances precisely in this light.
Read also
Court voids state “expert review” on UOC – so where is “Moscow link” now?
Persecution for faith is a crime. And sooner or later, it receives its verdict.
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.