When some suffer while others demand a “genuine peace”

Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Apostrof

At a conference in Poland, the head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, once again spoke out against ending the war with Russia, stating that “true peace has nothing to do with pacifism.” He criticized the idea of “peace at any price” and declared that “genuine peace is bound up with truth and justice for the victims, the restoration of international law, and accountability for the perpetrators.”

In today’s circumstances, Shevchuk’s talk of “restoring international law and holding perpetrators accountable” can only be read as demanding Russia’s capitulation. How realistic is that now?

Given the situation at the front, the economy, and Ukraine’s prospects for international assistance, the likelihood is extremely low. Meanwhile, many Ukrainians continue to die every day – both military and civilians. Why does Shevchuk ignore this? It seems there are several reasons.

The majority of UGCC parishes are abroad; they do not suffer from the war. What is more, UGCC clergy actively court Ukrainian refugees in the EU (who are predominantly Orthodox) – and often successfully. The UGCC is growing.

Despite a strong post-Euromaidan expansion eastward, the overwhelming share of UGCC parishes inside Ukraine is in the country’s west. People there hardly feel the war’s breath. Strikes do happen – but very rarely.

UGCC clergy are not mobilized; they have exemptions. And those “needed” by the Uniates are “patriotically” shielded from the draft.

The entire rhetoric of the UGCC – and of Shevchuk personally – is built on “justice” in war, on securing that justice at any cost, regardless of the casualties. It just so happens that Greek Catholics bear far less of that “cost” than others, since they are scarcely present in the “war” regions. Yes, the draft offices operate in Halychyna too, sending UGCC parishioners to the front. But apparently not with enough effect to temper the rhetoric of Uniate leaders.

In words, we have a “united country.” In reality, it’s a bit different: one part suffers from the war, while another calls for fighting on until a “genuine peace.”

Read also

A hint at a new demographic reality?

It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.