When some suffer while others demand a “genuine peace”
Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Apostrof
At a conference in Poland, the head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, once again spoke out against ending the war with Russia, stating that “true peace has nothing to do with pacifism.” He criticized the idea of “peace at any price” and declared that “genuine peace is bound up with truth and justice for the victims, the restoration of international law, and accountability for the perpetrators.”
In today’s circumstances, Shevchuk’s talk of “restoring international law and holding perpetrators accountable” can only be read as demanding Russia’s capitulation. How realistic is that now?
Given the situation at the front, the economy, and Ukraine’s prospects for international assistance, the likelihood is extremely low. Meanwhile, many Ukrainians continue to die every day – both military and civilians. Why does Shevchuk ignore this? It seems there are several reasons.
The majority of UGCC parishes are abroad; they do not suffer from the war. What is more, UGCC clergy actively court Ukrainian refugees in the EU (who are predominantly Orthodox) – and often successfully. The UGCC is growing.
Despite a strong post-Euromaidan expansion eastward, the overwhelming share of UGCC parishes inside Ukraine is in the country’s west. People there hardly feel the war’s breath. Strikes do happen – but very rarely.
UGCC clergy are not mobilized; they have exemptions. And those “needed” by the Uniates are “patriotically” shielded from the draft.
The entire rhetoric of the UGCC – and of Shevchuk personally – is built on “justice” in war, on securing that justice at any cost, regardless of the casualties. It just so happens that Greek Catholics bear far less of that “cost” than others, since they are scarcely present in the “war” regions. Yes, the draft offices operate in Halychyna too, sending UGCC parishioners to the front. But apparently not with enough effect to temper the rhetoric of Uniate leaders.
In words, we have a “united country.” In reality, it’s a bit different: one part suffers from the war, while another calls for fighting on until a “genuine peace.”
Read also
Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?
A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.
“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”
One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.
Why people heroize those who beat TRC
Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?
On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?
Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?
So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.
Potemkin villages of Serhii Dumenko
In Volodymyr, in Cherkasy, and in other UOC cathedrals that were seized – wherever Dumenko comes – his motorcades are shadowed by buses of hired “supporters”. Dumenko leaves – and so do “Potemkin peasants” together with their "vladyka."