When some suffer while others demand a “genuine peace”
Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Apostrof
At a conference in Poland, the head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, once again spoke out against ending the war with Russia, stating that “true peace has nothing to do with pacifism.” He criticized the idea of “peace at any price” and declared that “genuine peace is bound up with truth and justice for the victims, the restoration of international law, and accountability for the perpetrators.”
In today’s circumstances, Shevchuk’s talk of “restoring international law and holding perpetrators accountable” can only be read as demanding Russia’s capitulation. How realistic is that now?
Given the situation at the front, the economy, and Ukraine’s prospects for international assistance, the likelihood is extremely low. Meanwhile, many Ukrainians continue to die every day – both military and civilians. Why does Shevchuk ignore this? It seems there are several reasons.
The majority of UGCC parishes are abroad; they do not suffer from the war. What is more, UGCC clergy actively court Ukrainian refugees in the EU (who are predominantly Orthodox) – and often successfully. The UGCC is growing.
Despite a strong post-Euromaidan expansion eastward, the overwhelming share of UGCC parishes inside Ukraine is in the country’s west. People there hardly feel the war’s breath. Strikes do happen – but very rarely.
UGCC clergy are not mobilized; they have exemptions. And those “needed” by the Uniates are “patriotically” shielded from the draft.
The entire rhetoric of the UGCC – and of Shevchuk personally – is built on “justice” in war, on securing that justice at any cost, regardless of the casualties. It just so happens that Greek Catholics bear far less of that “cost” than others, since they are scarcely present in the “war” regions. Yes, the draft offices operate in Halychyna too, sending UGCC parishioners to the front. But apparently not with enough effect to temper the rhetoric of Uniate leaders.
In words, we have a “united country.” In reality, it’s a bit different: one part suffers from the war, while another calls for fighting on until a “genuine peace.”
Read also
Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?
The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.
On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group
The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.
Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?
Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?
The UOC and the end of the Yermak era
The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.
On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”
A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.
Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan
“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.