When some suffer while others demand a “genuine peace”
Sviatoslav Shevchuk. Photo: Apostrof
At a conference in Poland, the head of the UGCC, Sviatoslav Shevchuk, once again spoke out against ending the war with Russia, stating that “true peace has nothing to do with pacifism.” He criticized the idea of “peace at any price” and declared that “genuine peace is bound up with truth and justice for the victims, the restoration of international law, and accountability for the perpetrators.”
In today’s circumstances, Shevchuk’s talk of “restoring international law and holding perpetrators accountable” can only be read as demanding Russia’s capitulation. How realistic is that now?
Given the situation at the front, the economy, and Ukraine’s prospects for international assistance, the likelihood is extremely low. Meanwhile, many Ukrainians continue to die every day – both military and civilians. Why does Shevchuk ignore this? It seems there are several reasons.
The majority of UGCC parishes are abroad; they do not suffer from the war. What is more, UGCC clergy actively court Ukrainian refugees in the EU (who are predominantly Orthodox) – and often successfully. The UGCC is growing.
Despite a strong post-Euromaidan expansion eastward, the overwhelming share of UGCC parishes inside Ukraine is in the country’s west. People there hardly feel the war’s breath. Strikes do happen – but very rarely.
UGCC clergy are not mobilized; they have exemptions. And those “needed” by the Uniates are “patriotically” shielded from the draft.
The entire rhetoric of the UGCC – and of Shevchuk personally – is built on “justice” in war, on securing that justice at any cost, regardless of the casualties. It just so happens that Greek Catholics bear far less of that “cost” than others, since they are scarcely present in the “war” regions. Yes, the draft offices operate in Halychyna too, sending UGCC parishioners to the front. But apparently not with enough effect to temper the rhetoric of Uniate leaders.
In words, we have a “united country.” In reality, it’s a bit different: one part suffers from the war, while another calls for fighting on until a “genuine peace.”
Read also
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.
Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.
Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.
Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?
Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.
Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.