Why seize others' churches if you are destroying your own?
The Intercession Church of the OCU in Zhytomyr. Photo: "Suspilne"
In the center of Zhytomyr, the unique Intercession Church, which has been under the jurisdiction of the OCU since 2015, is deteriorating. "Suspilne" made an a full report showing the terrible condition of this shrine, built in 1902: peeling walls, a collapsed floor, mold in the altar, etc.
In fact, in the 1990s, the state handed over the Kyiv-Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavras, as well as hundreds of other historical churches across the country, to the UOC in a similar condition. Literally within a year or two, the clergy and parishioners transformed these ruins into beautiful and well-maintained churches. And it is in such a state that the state is now taking them back.
But in the case of the Zhytomyr church, everything is different. It has been 10 years since it came under the jurisdiction of the OCU, but the condition of the shrine is simply shocking. "Archbishop" Volodymyr Shlapak complains that he asks the state for money for repairs, but the authorities somehow do not provide it (should they?). Since 2019, "services" have been held here, but for some reason, no one knows about them. Journalists asked passersby if they were aware that there is a church here – everyone said no. The shrine is needed by no one.
Meanwhile, the OCU is taking churches from the UOC. Recently, Shlapak became notorious for instructing raiders to break the fence and being the first to crawl through the resulting hole during the seizure in Potiivka.
In other words, Shlapak allows his own churches to fall into disrepair but takes others' churches.
Apparently, so that later he can complain that the authorities do not repair them.
Read also
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.