Why seize others' churches if you are destroying your own?
The Intercession Church of the OCU in Zhytomyr. Photo: "Suspilne"
In the center of Zhytomyr, the unique Intercession Church, which has been under the jurisdiction of the OCU since 2015, is deteriorating. "Suspilne" made an a full report showing the terrible condition of this shrine, built in 1902: peeling walls, a collapsed floor, mold in the altar, etc.
In fact, in the 1990s, the state handed over the Kyiv-Pechersk and Pochaiv Lavras, as well as hundreds of other historical churches across the country, to the UOC in a similar condition. Literally within a year or two, the clergy and parishioners transformed these ruins into beautiful and well-maintained churches. And it is in such a state that the state is now taking them back.
But in the case of the Zhytomyr church, everything is different. It has been 10 years since it came under the jurisdiction of the OCU, but the condition of the shrine is simply shocking. "Archbishop" Volodymyr Shlapak complains that he asks the state for money for repairs, but the authorities somehow do not provide it (should they?). Since 2019, "services" have been held here, but for some reason, no one knows about them. Journalists asked passersby if they were aware that there is a church here – everyone said no. The shrine is needed by no one.
Meanwhile, the OCU is taking churches from the UOC. Recently, Shlapak became notorious for instructing raiders to break the fence and being the first to crawl through the resulting hole during the seizure in Potiivka.
In other words, Shlapak allows his own churches to fall into disrepair but takes others' churches.
Apparently, so that later he can complain that the authorities do not repair them.
Read also
Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed
According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.
"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine
At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?
Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?
Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?
“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”
Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.