Are deliberations regarding autocephaly and Feofania needed today?

Council of the UOC in Feofania. Photo: UOC Press Service

Since mid-September, several respected hierarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have entered into sharp polemics about autocephaly, taking diametrically opposed positions regarding the possibility of granting the Church an autocephalous status. After Metropolitan Theodosiy’s podcast, the discussions abruptly shifted to the Council of the UOC in Feofania. Some hierarchs insist that the Council was held under government pressure, while others claim that no pressure was exerted. The statements are becoming increasingly harsh – at times even offensive.

Some believers take the side of “their” hierarchs and accuse the “others.” The rest simply watch the situation with bewilderment and dismay, unable to understand how such a thing can happen under the current circumstances the Church is facing.

1. The UOC stands one step away from a ban.
Amid church seizures and the relentless mobilization of clergy, the authorities have decided to ban the activities of the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. Should this occur, the Church will face extremely serious challenges to its very functioning. How appropriate, then, are disputes among the hierarchy on any subject at all?

2. The topic of autocephaly is entirely out of place right now.
Both its proponents and opponents clearly understand that the issue they are debating is purely theoretical. The topic of Feofania is even less relevant – its discussion can bring no benefit whatsoever to the Church.

The UOJ conducted two polls on social media and its website, asking believers whether they supported the public polemics among UOC hierarchs on the subjects of autocephaly and Feofania. Two-thirds responded that such debates today only undermine the unity of the UOC and scandalize the faithful. This result is hardly surprising. People observe the “showdowns” among bishops with confusion and anxiety – while the enemies of the Church rub their hands in satisfaction.

At a time when the Church needs maximum mobilization and unity, the opposite is occurring. And, sadly, these processes have very little in common with Christianity. For in these mutual jabs and accusations there is everything but love. And without love, any claim to correctness or appeal to the canons is nothing but “a resounding brass.”

“Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves another has fulfilled the law,” wrote the Apostle Paul.

To this – we call everyone.

Read also

Orthodoxy and LGBT: Has the first domino fallen?

The Council of the Finnish Church has endorsed LGBT rights and supporters of gender ideology.

On Constantinople Patriarchate’s decision to honor head of organized crime group

The Ecumenical Patriarchate never ceases to astonish.

Opening a bust of Mazepa: A new era for Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra. Or not?

Do Zelensky, Yelensky, and the rest of the Kotliarevska cohort truly believe that, in the Lavra, prayer should be displaced by these absurd Soviet-style spectacles?

The UOC and the end of the Yermak era

The man who clearly played a major role in the processes unfolding between the authorities and the UOC has stepped down.

On the harassment of a Russian speaking child by “OCU atheist”

A scandal is now raging online over the latest outburst of a language activist who decided to “cut down to size” a 3-year-old displaced girl.

Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan

“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the head of the Finnish Church protested.