Are deliberations regarding autocephaly and Feofania needed today?

Council of the UOC in Feofania. Photo: UOC Press Service

Since mid-September, several respected hierarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have entered into sharp polemics about autocephaly, taking diametrically opposed positions regarding the possibility of granting the Church an autocephalous status. After Metropolitan Theodosiy’s podcast, the discussions abruptly shifted to the Council of the UOC in Feofania. Some hierarchs insist that the Council was held under government pressure, while others claim that no pressure was exerted. The statements are becoming increasingly harsh – at times even offensive.

Some believers take the side of “their” hierarchs and accuse the “others.” The rest simply watch the situation with bewilderment and dismay, unable to understand how such a thing can happen under the current circumstances the Church is facing.

1. The UOC stands one step away from a ban.
Amid church seizures and the relentless mobilization of clergy, the authorities have decided to ban the activities of the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. Should this occur, the Church will face extremely serious challenges to its very functioning. How appropriate, then, are disputes among the hierarchy on any subject at all?

2. The topic of autocephaly is entirely out of place right now.
Both its proponents and opponents clearly understand that the issue they are debating is purely theoretical. The topic of Feofania is even less relevant – its discussion can bring no benefit whatsoever to the Church.

The UOJ conducted two polls on social media and its website, asking believers whether they supported the public polemics among UOC hierarchs on the subjects of autocephaly and Feofania. Two-thirds responded that such debates today only undermine the unity of the UOC and scandalize the faithful. This result is hardly surprising. People observe the “showdowns” among bishops with confusion and anxiety – while the enemies of the Church rub their hands in satisfaction.

At a time when the Church needs maximum mobilization and unity, the opposite is occurring. And, sadly, these processes have very little in common with Christianity. For in these mutual jabs and accusations there is everything but love. And without love, any claim to correctness or appeal to the canons is nothing but “a resounding brass.”

“Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves another has fulfilled the law,” wrote the Apostle Paul.

To this – we call everyone.

Read also

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.