Are deliberations regarding autocephaly and Feofania needed today?
Council of the UOC in Feofania. Photo: UOC Press Service
Since mid-September, several respected hierarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church have entered into sharp polemics about autocephaly, taking diametrically opposed positions regarding the possibility of granting the Church an autocephalous status. After Metropolitan Theodosiy’s podcast, the discussions abruptly shifted to the Council of the UOC in Feofania. Some hierarchs insist that the Council was held under government pressure, while others claim that no pressure was exerted. The statements are becoming increasingly harsh – at times even offensive.
Some believers take the side of “their” hierarchs and accuse the “others.” The rest simply watch the situation with bewilderment and dismay, unable to understand how such a thing can happen under the current circumstances the Church is facing.
1. The UOC stands one step away from a ban.
Amid church seizures and the relentless mobilization of clergy, the authorities have decided to ban the activities of the Kyiv Metropolis of the UOC. Should this occur, the Church will face extremely serious challenges to its very functioning. How appropriate, then, are disputes among the hierarchy on any subject at all?
2. The topic of autocephaly is entirely out of place right now.
Both its proponents and opponents clearly understand that the issue they are debating is purely theoretical. The topic of Feofania is even less relevant – its discussion can bring no benefit whatsoever to the Church.
The UOJ conducted two polls on social media and its website, asking believers whether they supported the public polemics among UOC hierarchs on the subjects of autocephaly and Feofania. Two-thirds responded that such debates today only undermine the unity of the UOC and scandalize the faithful. This result is hardly surprising. People observe the “showdowns” among bishops with confusion and anxiety – while the enemies of the Church rub their hands in satisfaction.
At a time when the Church needs maximum mobilization and unity, the opposite is occurring. And, sadly, these processes have very little in common with Christianity. For in these mutual jabs and accusations there is everything but love. And without love, any claim to correctness or appeal to the canons is nothing but “a resounding brass.”
“Owe no one anything, except to love one another; for he who loves another has fulfilled the law,” wrote the Apostle Paul.
To this – we call everyone.
Read also
Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.
The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon
According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.
On statistics: how many Orthodox, Muslims and Jews we have
Trust in the Razumkov Center's research methods on the topic of Orthodoxy is minimal.