Power and UOC: Schizophrenia as state policy

Zelensky and Metropolitan Onuphry. Photo: Office of the President

Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office and the SBU announced charges against Metropolitan Kirill of Stavropol, head of the ROC Synodal Department for Cooperation with the Russian Armed Forces.

Among the accusations was the curious phrase: “Kirill contributed to subordinating Ukrainian dioceses to Moscow.”

As we all understand, no dioceses of the OCU or UGCC have ever been subordinated to Moscow. Which means that by “Ukrainian dioceses,” the prosecution clearly means the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC). And this isn’t a slip of the tongue – it’s a pattern. Back in April 2025, the SBU announced suspicions against 14 “high-ranking” ROC clerics who had allegedly “helped seize Ukrainian churches in the temporarily occupied territories.”

At the same time, every branch of government – from Zelensky downward – insists on calling the UOC “Moscow’s” and “Russian.” The State Service for Ethnopolitics (DESS) even produced an entire “study” supposedly proving that the UOC is part of the ROC.

On the basis of this “Russianness,” the state keeps expelling communities from their historic churches, forcibly “transferring” them to the OCU, stripping clergy of mobilization exemptions, and in general implementing a law aimed at the total destruction of the UOC.

So – when convenient, the UOC is “Russian”; when not, it’s “Ukrainian.” The authorities behave schizophrenically – splitting their own narrative whenever convenience demands. Nothing less than a political split personality disorder.

The etymology of the word schizophrenia comes from “split mind.” In popular culture, it’s often confused with “split personality.” In reality, schizophrenia is quite rare – about 4 to 6 cases per thousand people. But judging by current events, the concentration among our government officials appears to be significantly higher.

Read also

The UGCC “сan survive persecution” – unless it happens to someone else

The current situation surrounding the UOC is no different from what the Uniates themselves experienced after the Lviv Council.

Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?

The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.

The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon

According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”

On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd

According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.

Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?

After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.

On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper

A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.