Why do Nigerian and Ukrainian presidents sound so alike?
Presidents of Nigeria and Ukraine. Collage: UOJ
President Donald Trump has threatened military action against Nigeria over the Islamist terror targeting Christians. Defense Minister Pete Hegseth declared: “Either the Nigerian government protects Christians, or we will destroy the Islamic terrorists committing these horrific atrocities.”
And Hegseth is hardly exaggerating. Between 2019 and 2023, nearly 17,000 Christians were killed; in just the first seven months of 2025, over 7,000 more lost their lives. Since 2009, around 19,000 Christian churches have been destroyed or seriously damaged – an average of three per day.
Yet the reaction of the Nigerian authorities is striking. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu stated:
“Freedom of religion and tolerance have always been a cornerstone of our collective identity and will remain so. Nigeria stands against religious persecution and does not condone it.”
Sound familiar?
Here’s what President Zelensky told an American journalist about the UOC:
“Believers, their faith, their aspirations, and their churches have never been restricted by anyone. On the contrary, the state has always supported them, and they are very free.”
There’s no need to recall his repeated claims that Ukraine is practically an ideal of religious liberty.
True, believers and clergy of the UOC aren’t being killed – yet. They’re merely beaten brutally, have their teeth knocked out, their noses, jaws, arms, and legs broken. And churches aren’t destroyed – they’re simply seized.
But can one still claim that in Ukraine “people’s faith has never been restricted by anyone”?
Each of us can answer that question for ourselves.
Read also
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.
Athonite monks at Dumenko’s Lavra “service”
OCU benefactors paid for the visit of a magnificent Byzantine choir led by the Archon Protopsaltis of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
When building a church is banned – is that “freedom of faith”?
In Nychehivka, the authorities unlawfully halted construction of a UOC church on private land.
Mobilizing UOC clergy: Are the authorities simply purging “Moscow priests”?
UOC clerics – unlike those of the OCU, UGCC, Jews, Muslims, and pagans – are granted no exemptions.
Will those who praised the Nazis be included in Ukraine's Pantheon of Heroes?
It may prove difficult to argue that people who sent greetings to Hitler and praised the Nazi army do not fall under Ukraine’s laws condemning Nazism.