About new martyrs and Metropolitan Arseniy

Metropolitan Arseniy in hospital. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra

We rarely pause to think about how the confessors of the faith actually lived, how they carried out their spiritual feats, how they were seen by their contemporaries. We look at their icons and turn to them in prayer as saints pleasing to God. Yet in their own time they lived ordinary lives. Just like many of us today, they doubted, they were afraid, and they stood before a choice: conscience or comfort, fidelity to the Church or service to the world.

On November 3, Metropolitan Arseniy was once again thrown behind bars. Thrown there despite his obvious health issues, despite the fact that he has already spent a year and a half in pretrial detention, despite the complete absence of any real necessity to keep him in prison.

We cannot know this with absolute certainty, but everyone understands: the accusations against the hierarch are contrived. The authorities want something from him. Perhaps betrayal of the Church. Perhaps betrayal of his people. Perhaps betrayal of his own conscience. But they have achieved nothing. The metropolitan quietly and without protest returns to prison.

In his words after the court’s decision, he did not utter a single word of condemnation toward those who persecute him. On the contrary, he asked forgiveness of the SBU officers if he had shouted or spoken harshly in the heat of the moment. “Brothers, don’t take it to heart, forgive me,” the hierarch said.

We speak of this now not to place Metropolitan Arseniy on the same level as the confessors of the past – the New Martyrs who suffered under the Soviet regime. Yet it is impossible not to notice the parallels. It is unlikely that any of those confessors a hundred years ago told themselves: “Here I am, a martyr of God, performing a feat for Christ, and for this I will be canonized.” They simply acted as their conscience dictated. With the hope that God would not abandon His chosen ones. And only they themselves knew the price of that choice.

Metropolitan Arseniy does not say that he is performing a feat for Christ. He simply acts as his Christian and episcopal conscience commands him to act. And he accepts the heavy consequences of that choice.

On the struggle of Filaret's disciples after his death

After Filaret's death, the OCU intensifies its work to destroy his Kyiv Patriarchate.

Will Zelensky agree that his grandfather was “scum”?

Natalia Pipa is one of the authors of a bill seeking to ban the UOC.

116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?

In the fifth year of war with Russia, Ukraine’s authorities have suddenly announced the termination of a number of legal agreements with Russia and the CIS.

Filaret is dead – Zoria is going after Kyiv Patriarchate

After Filaret’s death, OCU spokesman Yevstratiy Zoria has resumed his media assault on his rivals from the Kyiv Patriarchate. Let’s look at his main claims.

Why do the people love Patriarch Ilia so deeply?

What people truly long for is not simply a leader, but a man who stands before God on their behalf – one through whom the light of the divine presence quietly, unmistakably shines. This is the one thing people await from a first hierarch above all else.

Why did no one come for Filaret?

When Filaret – who had been “reinstated in his rank” – died, not a single bishop from any Local Church came to his funeral.