About new martyrs and Metropolitan Arseniy

Metropolitan Arseniy in hospital. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra

We rarely pause to think about how the confessors of the faith actually lived, how they carried out their spiritual feats, how they were seen by their contemporaries. We look at their icons and turn to them in prayer as saints pleasing to God. Yet in their own time they lived ordinary lives. Just like many of us today, they doubted, they were afraid, and they stood before a choice: conscience or comfort, fidelity to the Church or service to the world.

On November 3, Metropolitan Arseniy was once again thrown behind bars. Thrown there despite his obvious health issues, despite the fact that he has already spent a year and a half in pretrial detention, despite the complete absence of any real necessity to keep him in prison.

We cannot know this with absolute certainty, but everyone understands: the accusations against the hierarch are contrived. The authorities want something from him. Perhaps betrayal of the Church. Perhaps betrayal of his people. Perhaps betrayal of his own conscience. But they have achieved nothing. The metropolitan quietly and without protest returns to prison.

In his words after the court’s decision, he did not utter a single word of condemnation toward those who persecute him. On the contrary, he asked forgiveness of the SBU officers if he had shouted or spoken harshly in the heat of the moment. “Brothers, don’t take it to heart, forgive me,” the hierarch said.

We speak of this now not to place Metropolitan Arseniy on the same level as the confessors of the past – the New Martyrs who suffered under the Soviet regime. Yet it is impossible not to notice the parallels. It is unlikely that any of those confessors a hundred years ago told themselves: “Here I am, a martyr of God, performing a feat for Christ, and for this I will be canonized.” They simply acted as their conscience dictated. With the hope that God would not abandon His chosen ones. And only they themselves knew the price of that choice.

Metropolitan Arseniy does not say that he is performing a feat for Christ. He simply acts as his Christian and episcopal conscience commands him to act. And he accepts the heavy consequences of that choice.

Read also

State and Churches: For Catholics – restitution; for Orthodox – confiscation

Shouldn’t DESS be campaigning for the Kyiv Caves Lavra to be returned to the Church after the Bolsheviks expelled the monks a hundred years ago and turned it into a “museum complex”?

Why the idea of a "national Church" is doomed

According to the most optimistic estimates, the population of Ukraine is now no more than 19 million. The figure is shocking, especially when you remember that at the beginning of independence, 52 million people lived in the country.

"The UOC doesn’t hold funerals for soldiers": a lie-manufacturing machine

At the end of December, a wave of outrage swept across the internet over claims that UOC priests refused to serve a funeral for a fallen soldier in the Bukovynian village of Banyliv-Pidhirnyi. So what actually happened there?

Budanov instead of Yermak: Will anything change for the UOC?

Will the new head of the Presidential Office use the post to wage war against the UOC?

“Should Bandera's birthday occur…”

Congratulations are posted for Bandera’s birthday on the pages of three popular OCU “priest-bloggers.” However, there are no publications at all dedicated to Basil the Great or to the Feast of the Circumcision.

Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.