About new martyrs and Metropolitan Arseniy
Metropolitan Arseniy in hospital. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra
We rarely pause to think about how the confessors of the faith actually lived, how they carried out their spiritual feats, how they were seen by their contemporaries. We look at their icons and turn to them in prayer as saints pleasing to God. Yet in their own time they lived ordinary lives. Just like many of us today, they doubted, they were afraid, and they stood before a choice: conscience or comfort, fidelity to the Church or service to the world.
On November 3, Metropolitan Arseniy was once again thrown behind bars. Thrown there despite his obvious health issues, despite the fact that he has already spent a year and a half in pretrial detention, despite the complete absence of any real necessity to keep him in prison.
We cannot know this with absolute certainty, but everyone understands: the accusations against the hierarch are contrived. The authorities want something from him. Perhaps betrayal of the Church. Perhaps betrayal of his people. Perhaps betrayal of his own conscience. But they have achieved nothing. The metropolitan quietly and without protest returns to prison.
In his words after the court’s decision, he did not utter a single word of condemnation toward those who persecute him. On the contrary, he asked forgiveness of the SBU officers if he had shouted or spoken harshly in the heat of the moment. “Brothers, don’t take it to heart, forgive me,” the hierarch said.
We speak of this now not to place Metropolitan Arseniy on the same level as the confessors of the past – the New Martyrs who suffered under the Soviet regime. Yet it is impossible not to notice the parallels. It is unlikely that any of those confessors a hundred years ago told themselves: “Here I am, a martyr of God, performing a feat for Christ, and for this I will be canonized.” They simply acted as their conscience dictated. With the hope that God would not abandon His chosen ones. And only they themselves knew the price of that choice.
Metropolitan Arseniy does not say that he is performing a feat for Christ. He simply acts as his Christian and episcopal conscience commands him to act. And he accepts the heavy consequences of that choice.
Read also
Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists
In public, lobbyists for the Ukrainian authorities in the United States insist that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. In reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case.
Was the true number of voluntary transfers accidentally revealed in the OCU?
38 clerics out of 2000 "transfers" are about 2%. This is the exact percentage of actual voluntary transitions from the UOC to the OCU demonstrated to us by Serhiy Dumenko.
Opinion polls on the war and Zelensky: a case study in manufactured consent
KIIS polls on church-related issues have long served Dumenko and his circle as convenient “evidence” that the majority of Ukrainians supposedly belong to the OCU.
Seven years of the OCU – what fruits has it borne?
On the anniversary of the event, Dumenko produced a pompous text that appears to have been written in some parallel reality.
Metropolitan Arseniy and the Kremenchuk deputy: what is common?
The example in Kremenchuk is yet another evidence of the authorities' double standards. And we have the right to say that Bishop Arseniy is in the pre-trial detention center not because he committed a crime.
On sausage and milk during the fast
The true meaning of fasting is not gastronomical but spiritual. Yet how many of us can honestly say that during the fast we pray more, refrain from judging anyone, visit hospitals and prisons, and tend to those in distress?