Who terrifies the authorities more: A murderous shepherd or a righteous one?
Metropolitan Arseniy in an ambulance. Photo: Sviatohirsk Lavra
On November 3, the Dnipro court once again returned Metropolitan Arseniy of Sviatohirsk to the pre-trial detention center. According to the statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office, it was “for crimes against peace.” More precisely – for a “wrong” sermon.
The hierarch was thrown behind bars without the right to bail, despite having already spent a year and a half in prison for nothing. Despite suffering from serious health problems – on the very day of the hearing, an ambulance had to take him to the hospital.
That same day, November 3, in Truskavets, a Uniate (UGCC) priest, Volodymyr Luzhetsky, killed a man in a drunk-driving accident. Like Metropolitan Arseniy, Luzhetsky was placed in pre-trial detention. But there is a nuance – he can walk free as soon as he pays bail: 242,000 hryvnias.
And so what do we have?
A clergyman of one confession, who during deadly shelling never abandoned the Lavra and cared for hundreds of refugees, sits behind bars under absurd accusations. He has been prescribed urgent heart surgery – but he cannot leave the detention center.
A clergyman of another confession has killed a man – yet he can walk free at any moment for six thousand dollars.
We by no means wish Luzhetsky harm; prison is always a terrible thing.
But the contrast in how the authorities treat them is simply too striking to ignore.
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.