The difference between “Kvartal 95” and the UOC

Timur Myndych, Zelensky’s friend and CEO of “Kvartal 95.” Photo: 24 Kanal

Today, a shocking scandal has engulfed President Zelensky’s inner circle, centered on a man whom the media describes as his long-time close friend – Tymur Mindich. Mindich is accused of overseeing massive corruption schemes in the energy and defense sectors, schemes through which hundreds of millions of dollars were allegedly laundered.

But beyond all that, Zelensky and Mindich are linked by many years of working together in “Kvartal 95,” where Mindich is both co-owner and CEO.

The studio has now released a statement insisting that Mindich has no influence over them and appealing to the public not to apply the principle of collective responsibility to the project’s employees. “The co-owner has a legal connection to the Studio, but does not participate in its work and does not influence its content or decisions. ‘Kvartal 95’ is not one person but a brand and a large team that has existed for over 20 years and all this time has been engaged exclusively in producing audio-visual content,” the statement reads.

This post was shared by the group “Myriany” (UOC laity union  wrote – Ed.) with the comment: “By this same logic, no one should be touching the UOC either, right?”

And indeed, the parallels with the UOC are hard to miss. Mindich has a legal tie to the studio. The UOC doesn’t even have that with the ROC – its connection lies solely in the realm of canon law, and Moscow neither influences nor can influence the Ukrainian Church.

Do Zelensky and other officials take this into account? Quite the opposite. Society is being persuaded that the UOC is “Moscow-run,” “FSB-controlled,” and must bear responsibility for every action of the Kremlin.

The team at Kvartal stresses that they are a large collective that cannot be held responsible for Mindich’s actions and that they are simply doing their work. But is this not precisely what UOC clergy and believers have been trying to explain for years? That they simply attend services and pray, as generations before them did? That they are not responsible for the positions of hierarchs in another northern country?

If Zelensky is a man of principle, then “Kvartal 95” should be closed, and criminal cases and sanctions should be opened against its members – exactly as he has done to many hierarchs, priests, and even Orthodox journalists, who have done nothing wrong.

But something suggests that this will not happen. As “Myriany” wrote, “this is different.”

Read also

From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed

In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.

Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?

A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.

“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.

Why people heroize those who beat TRC

Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?

On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk

Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?

Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.