The difference between “Kvartal 95” and the UOC
Timur Myndych, Zelensky’s friend and CEO of “Kvartal 95.” Photo: 24 Kanal
Today, a shocking scandal has engulfed President Zelensky’s inner circle, centered on a man whom the media describes as his long-time close friend – Tymur Mindich. Mindich is accused of overseeing massive corruption schemes in the energy and defense sectors, schemes through which hundreds of millions of dollars were allegedly laundered.
But beyond all that, Zelensky and Mindich are linked by many years of working together in “Kvartal 95,” where Mindich is both co-owner and CEO.
The studio has now released a statement insisting that Mindich has no influence over them and appealing to the public not to apply the principle of collective responsibility to the project’s employees. “The co-owner has a legal connection to the Studio, but does not participate in its work and does not influence its content or decisions. ‘Kvartal 95’ is not one person but a brand and a large team that has existed for over 20 years and all this time has been engaged exclusively in producing audio-visual content,” the statement reads.
This post was shared by the group “Myriany” (UOC laity union wrote – Ed.) with the comment: “By this same logic, no one should be touching the UOC either, right?”
And indeed, the parallels with the UOC are hard to miss. Mindich has a legal tie to the studio. The UOC doesn’t even have that with the ROC – its connection lies solely in the realm of canon law, and Moscow neither influences nor can influence the Ukrainian Church.
Do Zelensky and other officials take this into account? Quite the opposite. Society is being persuaded that the UOC is “Moscow-run,” “FSB-controlled,” and must bear responsibility for every action of the Kremlin.
The team at Kvartal stresses that they are a large collective that cannot be held responsible for Mindich’s actions and that they are simply doing their work. But is this not precisely what UOC clergy and believers have been trying to explain for years? That they simply attend services and pray, as generations before them did? That they are not responsible for the positions of hierarchs in another northern country?
If Zelensky is a man of principle, then “Kvartal 95” should be closed, and criminal cases and sanctions should be opened against its members – exactly as he has done to many hierarchs, priests, and even Orthodox journalists, who have done nothing wrong.
But something suggests that this will not happen. As “Myriany” wrote, “this is different.”
Read also
A hint at a new demographic reality?
It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.