On the sureties for Metropolitan Arseniy and "Che Guevara"
Phanar’s Exarch in court. Photo: Suspilne
On 18 November, Orthodox Ukraine was stunned by the appearance of Bishop Michael (Anishchenko), the exarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, at the High Anti-Corruption Court. He came to the hearing of former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksii Chernyshov – a key figure in the “Mindich case” – and announced his readiness to stand surety for him.
According to NABU, Chernyshov was involved in vast corruption schemes that caused the state hundreds of millions of dollars in damage. Investigators say that Chernyshov (known among the corrupt networks by the nickname “Che Guevara”) received more than 1.2 million dollars and almost 100,000 euros in cash.
It was for this man that a bishop of the Ecumenical Patriarchate came to vouch.
A desire to help someone in trouble is, of course, a noble impulse. But for a hierarch, such an act would appear honorable only under one condition: if he were convinced of Chernyshov’s innocence – if Chernyshov were his spiritual child, confessed regularly, received Communion, and lived a genuine church life.
But is that the case? No. Chernyshov has never once appeared at St. Andrew’s Church, where the exarch serves. Moreover, there is no indication that he has ever attended an Orthodox service at all.
Society is outraged by the scale of corruption uncovered in the “Mindich case” and is firmly set against its participants. Bishop Michael, being an intelligent man, cannot fail to understand that stepping forward for “Che Guevara” casts a very heavy shadow over him. So why did the exarch go to court?
He told Left Bank that he had previously “crossed paths” with Chernyshov and knows him “as a good man,” and that Chernyshov’s aides had “asked” him to come.
Many people “crossed paths” with Che Guevara during his time as deputy prime minister. But only Bishop Michael showed up in court. Perhaps the request came in such a way that refusing to help Zelensky’s "kum" (godfather of his children – Ed.) was simply impossible?
And one more thing. Not long ago there was another high-profile trial – that of Bishop Michael’s brother in the episcopate, Metropolitan Arseniy. We would hardly be mistaken in calling him a righteous man – a Man with a capital M. There are a few people who, at every hearing, ask the court to release the metropolitan on surety. Yes, there is still no result, but we are grateful to them for their steadfastness.
It is just deeply regrettable that among these people there is no exarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Bishop Michael. But it seems he has made his choice.
Read also
Nerves on edge: Why DESS is going after UOC's lawyers
The DESS lawsuit against the Kyiv Metropolia is not unfolding the way Viktor Yelensky had hoped.
Ten years after the Great Cross Procession: faith through trial
Ten years ago, nearly 100,000 faithful filled the streets of Kyiv. Today, the Lavra has been taken away, religious processions have been all but banned, and the Church faces persecution.
Clergy “busification,” or the routine genocide of Orthodox priests
The video of masked men grabbing a priest by his arms and legs and throwing him into a van shocked many people. It was the first time we had seen a clergyman treated this way with our own eyes.
Advocatus diaboli: when falsehood becomes a virtue
Listening to the rhetoric of Shevchuk and his UCCRO colleagues, one cannot help but think of the famous film starring Al Pacino and Keanu Reeves – the one in which Reeves’s character discovers that he has been working as an attorney for the devil.
Authorities “open” the Far Caves – whatever they do, nothing works for them
The authorities and the OCU are straining every nerve to make everything look properly “churchlike” – every bit as respectable as under the “Moscow priests.” Yet all they ever produce is a parody with a distinctly Bolshevik stench.