On the sureties for Metropolitan Arseniy and "Che Guevara"

Phanar’s Exarch in court. Photo: Suspilne

On 18 November, Orthodox Ukraine was stunned by the appearance of Bishop Michael (Anishchenko), the exarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, at the High Anti-Corruption Court. He came to the hearing of former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksii Chernyshov – a key figure in the “Mindich case” – and announced his readiness to stand surety for him.

According to NABU, Chernyshov was involved in vast corruption schemes that caused the state hundreds of millions of dollars in damage. Investigators say that Chernyshov (known among the corrupt networks by the nickname “Che Guevara”) received more than 1.2 million dollars and almost 100,000 euros in cash.

It was for this man that a bishop of the Ecumenical Patriarchate came to vouch.

A desire to help someone in trouble is, of course, a noble impulse. But for a hierarch, such an act would appear honorable only under one condition: if he were convinced of Chernyshov’s innocence – if Chernyshov were his spiritual child, confessed regularly, received Communion, and lived a genuine church life.

But is that the case? No. Chernyshov has never once appeared at St. Andrew’s Church, where the exarch serves. Moreover, there is no indication that he has ever attended an Orthodox service at all.

Society is outraged by the scale of corruption uncovered in the “Mindich case” and is firmly set against its participants. Bishop Michael, being an intelligent man, cannot fail to understand that stepping forward for “Che Guevara” casts a very heavy shadow over him. So why did the exarch go to court?

He told Left Bank that he had previously “crossed paths” with Chernyshov and knows him “as a good man,” and that Chernyshov’s aides had “asked” him to come.

Many people “crossed paths” with Che Guevara during his time as deputy prime minister. But only Bishop Michael showed up in court. Perhaps the request came in such a way that refusing to help Zelensky’s "kum" (godfather of his children – Ed.) was simply impossible?

And one more thing. Not long ago there was another high-profile trial – that of Bishop Michael’s brother in the episcopate, Metropolitan Arseniy. We would hardly be mistaken in calling him a righteous man – a Man with a capital M. There are a few people who, at every hearing, ask the court to release the metropolitan on surety. Yes, there is still no result, but we are grateful to them for their steadfastness.

It is just deeply regrettable that among these people there is no exarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Bishop Michael. But it seems he has made his choice.

Read also

Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration

Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.

What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?

The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.

Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment

If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.

Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity

UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.

Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?

Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.

Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence

Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.