Why Finnish archbishop speaks out against Trump’s peace plan

Archbishop of Helsinki together with Dumenko. Photo: OCU

The head of the Finnish Orthodox Church under the Ecumenical Patriarchate, Archbishop Elias, has officially declared that the American peace plan for Ukraine is unjust because it may include the rehabilitation of the UOC.

Calling the UOC “the Moscow Patriarchate,” he was outraged by one of the plan’s provisions requiring Ukraine to “correct its legislation on freedom of religion.”

“This requirement can only mean granting guarantees to the Moscow Patriarchate’s church structure in the country,” the hierarch protested, adding that he had been in Ukraine and saw for himself that no one persecutes the UOC.

“This condition is not based on facts. I know this because I have seen the truth with my own eyes,” the archbishop claimed.

A very weighty statement – at first glance. One might think the Finnish primate had done serious groundwork: met with the UOC leadership, visited at least dozens of communities that lost their churches, “saw the truth with his own eyes,” and formed an informed judgment based on firsthand observation.

But that impression is utterly false.

Because the archbishop then explains where his information actually came from.

“Our conversations with the head of DESS V. Yelensky and with the religious leaders of Lviv confirmed that freedom of religion in Ukraine is fully respected. Religious communities do not live in fear of one another but act freely,” the Constantinopolitan hierarch assured.

These words are staggering.

There are hundreds of videos documenting beatings carried out by OCU militants, footage of priests lying bloodied, and harsh reports by international human-rights bodies, including UN commissioners.

Yet Archbishop Elias notices none of this. He forms his judgment solely from conversations with a state official who has been persecuting the Church since Soviet times, and with OCU representatives who are currently intimidating and terrorizing parishioners.

His statement, published on the official website of the Finnish Church, concludes as follows: “A lasting peace cannot be built on injustice.”

So – ending the bloodshed and halting the crackdown on UOC believers is what he calls “injustice”? Out of the mouth of an Orthodox bishop this sounds like sheer mockery, or, to put it bluntly, absolute cringe. It’s the kind of twisted logic we’re used to hearing only from Dumenko and his troupe of “hierarchs.”

It is worth recalling that during his visit to Ukraine, the archbishop had close meetings with Dumenko and even concelebrated with him.

The Psalmist David warns of the consequences of such associations: “…with the pure you will show yourself pure, and with the crooked you will show yourself crooked.”

It seems that fellowship with the “crooked” never goes without leaving a mark.

Read also

Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?

In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.

Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed

The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.

Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money

While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.

Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?

No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.

Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?

If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?

How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"

From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.