The UOC and the end of the Yermak era
Yermak is gone, Zelensky remains. Photo: Getty Images
Andriy Yermak has long been called a gray cardinal – the figure who coordinated all state institutions and, in addition, wielded enormous influence over Zelensky himself.
The head of the Presidential Office rarely spoke publicly about the UOC, but his “contribution” to the state-driven persecution of the Church is undoubtedly significant.
In the early months of the war, Yermak, like Zelensky, did not take a hostile stance against the Church. His well-known social-media post called those who were inciting hatred toward the UOC “useful idiots.”
But later, something in the government seemed to flip a switch, and the entire leadership, headed by Zelensky, unleashed the full power of the state’s repressive machine upon the Church. The culmination of this onslaught was the law banning the UOC.
On the eve of the vote, Yermak declared:
“The Church in Ukraine will be stripped of Moscow’s influence. When, today, there are people in Ukraine who are ready to defend the influence of the Moscow Church… this is not normal. And this is not about freedom, but about something else entirely.”
And on the very day of the vote – August 20, 2024 – Yermak published a lengthy, overtly manipulative text attacking the Russian Orthodox Church, making it clear that, in his view, the UOC bore responsibility for all the sins of the ROC.
That, in essence, is the visible portion of Yermak’s activity concerning the UOC. But the submerged part of this iceberg is vast. “Friendly requests” to the SBU to open criminal cases against clergy; the siege and pressure campaign against the Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra; the relentless harassment of the UOC in government-aligned media; inflammatory statements from assorted MPs; the use of the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations as a convenient set of “tame advocates” for Western audiences; and much more.
Of course, the decisions were made by the president. But the one who implemented them – who orchestrated, fine-tuned, and supervised these processes – was a highly capable and talented organizer.
Now that talent is departing. His era has come to an end. And the next ones are already stepping forward.
“Do not fret because of evildoers, nor envy those who act unjustly – for they will soon be cut down like grass and wither like the green herb” (Ps. 36:1–2).
Read also
Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration
Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.
What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?
The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.
Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment
If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.
Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity
UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.
Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?
Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.
Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence
Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.