The UOC and the end of the Yermak era
Yermak is gone, Zelensky remains. Photo: Getty Images
Andriy Yermak has long been called a gray cardinal – the figure who coordinated all state institutions and, in addition, wielded enormous influence over Zelensky himself.
The head of the Presidential Office rarely spoke publicly about the UOC, but his “contribution” to the state-driven persecution of the Church is undoubtedly significant.
In the early months of the war, Yermak, like Zelensky, did not take a hostile stance against the Church. His well-known social-media post called those who were inciting hatred toward the UOC “useful idiots.”
But later, something in the government seemed to flip a switch, and the entire leadership, headed by Zelensky, unleashed the full power of the state’s repressive machine upon the Church. The culmination of this onslaught was the law banning the UOC.
On the eve of the vote, Yermak declared:
“The Church in Ukraine will be stripped of Moscow’s influence. When, today, there are people in Ukraine who are ready to defend the influence of the Moscow Church… this is not normal. And this is not about freedom, but about something else entirely.”
And on the very day of the vote – August 20, 2024 – Yermak published a lengthy, overtly manipulative text attacking the Russian Orthodox Church, making it clear that, in his view, the UOC bore responsibility for all the sins of the ROC.
That, in essence, is the visible portion of Yermak’s activity concerning the UOC. But the submerged part of this iceberg is vast. “Friendly requests” to the SBU to open criminal cases against clergy; the siege and pressure campaign against the Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra; the relentless harassment of the UOC in government-aligned media; inflammatory statements from assorted MPs; the use of the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations as a convenient set of “tame advocates” for Western audiences; and much more.
Of course, the decisions were made by the president. But the one who implemented them – who orchestrated, fine-tuned, and supervised these processes – was a highly capable and talented organizer.
Now that talent is departing. His era has come to an end. And the next ones are already stepping forward.
“Do not fret because of evildoers, nor envy those who act unjustly – for they will soon be cut down like grass and wither like the green herb” (Ps. 36:1–2).
Read also
The UGCC “сan survive persecution” – unless it happens to someone else
The current situation surrounding the UOC is no different from what the Uniates themselves experienced after the Lviv Council.
Was a UOC сhurch in Ivano-Frankivsk demolished for the sake of a park?
The authorities in Ivano-Frankivsk have decided to create a park on the vacant lot at 6 Chornovola Street. On the surface, the decision looks utterly routine. In reality, it says a great deal.
The devolution of Metropolitan Simeon
According to Shostatsky, “we know that where the majority is, there is the truth – not where the minority is.”
On how the OCU scorns its own rent-a-crowd
According to Zoria, the OCU looks down on staged crowds – for them, “what matters is truth, not the number” of parishioners. And yet, for every one of Epifaniy Dumenko’s traveling services, people are bused in by the coachload.
Persecution of UOC and liquidation of UGCC in 1946: Are there parallels?
After the defeat of Nazi Germany and the liberation of Western Ukraine, the leadership of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) initiated negotiations with Soviet authorities concerning the future of its ecclesiastical structure.
On the mobilization of a priest as a sniper
A man who has chosen the path of the priesthood has no right to join the army and take up a weapon. And the very idea of killing another human being is all the more absurd.