The UOC and the end of the Yermak era

Yermak is gone, Zelensky remains. Photo: Getty Images

Andriy Yermak has long been called a gray cardinal – the figure who coordinated all state institutions and, in addition, wielded enormous influence over Zelensky himself.

The head of the Presidential Office rarely spoke publicly about the UOC, but his “contribution” to the state-driven persecution of the Church is undoubtedly significant.

In the early months of the war, Yermak, like Zelensky, did not take a hostile stance against the Church. His well-known social-media post called those who were inciting hatred toward the UOC “useful idiots.”

But later, something in the government seemed to flip a switch, and the entire leadership, headed by Zelensky, unleashed the full power of the state’s repressive machine upon the Church. The culmination of this onslaught was the law banning the UOC.

On the eve of the vote, Yermak declared:

“The Church in Ukraine will be stripped of Moscow’s influence. When, today, there are people in Ukraine who are ready to defend the influence of the Moscow Church… this is not normal. And this is not about freedom, but about something else entirely.”

And on the very day of the vote – August 20, 2024 – Yermak published a lengthy, overtly manipulative text attacking the Russian Orthodox Church, making it clear that, in his view, the UOC bore responsibility for all the sins of the ROC.

That, in essence, is the visible portion of Yermak’s activity concerning the UOC. But the submerged part of this iceberg is vast. “Friendly requests” to the SBU to open criminal cases against clergy; the siege and pressure campaign against the Kyiv–Pechersk Lavra; the relentless harassment of the UOC in government-aligned media; inflammatory statements from assorted MPs; the use of the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations as a convenient set of “tame advocates” for Western audiences; and much more.

Of course, the decisions were made by the president. But the one who implemented them – who orchestrated, fine-tuned, and supervised these processes – was a highly capable and talented organizer.

Now that talent is departing. His era has come to an end. And the next ones are already stepping forward.

“Do not fret because of evildoers, nor envy those who act unjustly – for they will soon be cut down like grass and wither like the green herb” (Ps. 36:1–2).

Read also

On the situation at Sviatohirsk Lavra

After the killing of Monk Varsonofiy and the attempted murder of two other monastery residents, many patriots claimed that the crime had been committed by enemy saboteurs.

You’re happy, aren’t you? Then why change anything?

The KIIS poll seems to be telling the U.S. authorities: Look, Ukrainians like living this way. They’re not just satisfied with everything – they’re happy. They don’t need peace, so why change anything?

Portrait of the “сonscience of the nation”

Shevchuk waxes eloquent about the uniqueness of the Ukrainian nation and the value of human life – while supporting the sweeping mobilization that is grinding that very nation down.

OCU in the Lavra: When a recording replaces the choir

Parishioners have been pushed out of the Lavra. The monks are barred from the churches. But there is room for a handful of OCU “monks.”

Sviatohirsk murder no one is allowed to talk about

Logic suggests that Zelensky was informed about the monk’s murder that very day.

Sviatohirsk Lavra tragedy: A confession of faith or not?

The killers came to the monastery and, after hearing the words “Glory to our Lord God” in response, began to kill. What matters is that the victims were given a choice: they could give the “right” answer and escape death.