Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

Rally near Congress in defense of the UOC. Photo: UOJ

On December 18, two events took place in Ukraine and the United States that, at first glance, seemed unrelated.

In Volodymyr, MP Huz announced that he would expel the community of the Dormition Cathedral of the UOC – already driven out of its own church – even from the tiny chapel where parishioners now hold their services. Or rather, “hold” them… Only clergy can fit inside; the faithful stand outside in the street.

But that is not enough for Huz. He wants to drive people out of there as well. He initiated appeals to the Prosecutor General’s Office and local authorities “so that the Moscow church would be evicted from this religious building in the near future.” This is a textbook example of discrimination against Ukrainians on religious grounds – the very discrimination which, according to the assurances of the Ukrainian authorities, supposedly does not exist.

And in the United States, just two days after the summit in defense of the UOC near the Capitol, lobbyists for the Ukrainian government in Washington from the “American Coalition for Ukraine” presented an “internal” document in which this and other actions in defense of the UOC were gloomily described as a “problem” and “our Achilles’ heel.”

Let us stress this point: it was an insider document, “for internal use,” and therefore people wrote what they really think. In public, just like the Ukrainian authorities, they broadcast that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. But in reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case. They have only one concern – how to conceal these persecutions or pass them off as “Russian propaganda.”

And these people see nothing shameful in what they are doing. As the wolf in the old cartoon “Once Upon a Dog” said: “It’s just my job.”

Exactly the same kind of “job” is being done by Zelensky, Yelensky, and others like Huz and Poturaev. They, just like their “friends” in America, also consider the UOC problem an “Achilles’ heel” – but not because they seriously see in it a “Russian threat” or an “FSB network.”

But because they cannot hide their work aimed at destroying it.

Futile and self-defeating work.

Read also

Will Zelensky agree that his grandfather was “scum”?

Natalia Pipa is one of the authors of a bill seeking to ban the UOC.

116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?

In the fifth year of war with Russia, Ukraine’s authorities have suddenly announced the termination of a number of legal agreements with Russia and the CIS.

Filaret is dead – Zoria is going after Kyiv Patriarchate

After Filaret’s death, OCU spokesman Yevstratiy Zoria has resumed his media assault on his rivals from the Kyiv Patriarchate. Let’s look at his main claims.

Why do the people love Patriarch Ilia so deeply?

What people truly long for is not simply a leader, but a man who stands before God on their behalf – one through whom the light of the divine presence quietly, unmistakably shines. This is the one thing people await from a first hierarch above all else.

Why did no one come for Filaret?

When Filaret – who had been “reinstated in his rank” – died, not a single bishop from any Local Church came to his funeral.

Is this the end of the Kyiv Patriarchate?

The UOC-KP is not protesting the fact that its head will be buried by the OCU.