Why the defense of UOC is “Achilles’ heel” of Ukrainian government lobbyists

Rally near Congress in defense of the UOC. Photo: UOJ

On December 18, two events took place in Ukraine and the United States that, at first glance, seemed unrelated.

In Volodymyr, MP Huz announced that he would expel the community of the Dormition Cathedral of the UOC – already driven out of its own church – even from the tiny chapel where parishioners now hold their services. Or rather, “hold” them… Only clergy can fit inside; the faithful stand outside in the street.

But that is not enough for Huz. He wants to drive people out of there as well. He initiated appeals to the Prosecutor General’s Office and local authorities “so that the Moscow church would be evicted from this religious building in the near future.” This is a textbook example of discrimination against Ukrainians on religious grounds – the very discrimination which, according to the assurances of the Ukrainian authorities, supposedly does not exist.

And in the United States, just two days after the summit in defense of the UOC near the Capitol, lobbyists for the Ukrainian government in Washington from the “American Coalition for Ukraine” presented an “internal” document in which this and other actions in defense of the UOC were gloomily described as a “problem” and “our Achilles’ heel.”

Let us stress this point: it was an insider document, “for internal use,” and therefore people wrote what they really think. In public, just like the Ukrainian authorities, they broadcast that there is no persecution of the Church in Ukraine. But in reality, they know everything perfectly well and are aware of every single case. They have only one concern – how to conceal these persecutions or pass them off as “Russian propaganda.”

And these people see nothing shameful in what they are doing. As the wolf in the old cartoon “Once Upon a Dog” said: “It’s just my job.”

Exactly the same kind of “job” is being done by Zelensky, Yelensky, and others like Huz and Poturaev. They, just like their “friends” in America, also consider the UOC problem an “Achilles’ heel” – but not because they seriously see in it a “Russian threat” or an “FSB network.”

But because they cannot hide their work aimed at destroying it.

Futile and self-defeating work.

Read also

What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?

The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.

Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment

If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.

Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity

UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.

Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?

Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.

Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence

Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.

Court voids state “expert review” on UOC – so where is “Moscow link” now?

Persecution for faith is a crime. And sooner or later, it receives its verdict.