Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?
Metropolitan Onuphriy. Photo: UOC press service
At the end of January, American Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Constantinople Church criticized the hierarchs and Primate of the UOC for not commemorating Patriarch Kirill.
'Since these hierarchs (UOC. – Ed.), and possibly Metropolitan Onuphrius himself, refuse to commemorate the Patriarch of the ROC, how can they claim that they are the canonical Church?" the archbishop asks. And here it must be noted that from the side of the Phanar hierarch, this is not at all concern for the canonical status of the UOC, but an attempt to advance the interests of his structure. Literally in the next sentence, he calls on His Beatitude Onuphrius to commemorate the Constantinople Patriarch instead of the Russian Patriarch.
And a few days later, MP Bobrovska stated that she would write to the SBU because Metropolitan Onuphriy commemorates Patriarch Kirill. Supposedly, it's terrible when Onuphriy commemorates the Russian Patriarch, but not the Constantinople and Alexandrian ones.
There is also a third party – some «experts and interpreters» of canons living in the north. They cannot stand Archbishop Elpidophoros, but on the issue of commemorating or not commemorating the ROC Patriarch in Ukraine, they find themselves in a situational alliance with him. They agree that His Beatitude does not commemorate the ROC Patriarch but disagree that the UOC should commemorate Patriarch Bartholomew.
And we are perplexed. The Primate of the UOC has been commemorating the name of the head of the ROC along with the names of other Primates of Local Churches during the Great Entrance since May 2022. For almost 4 years now, he has been doing this at every service using the same formula. But nevertheless, for some he "does not commemorate" Patriarch Kirill, and this is bad. For other, he "commemorates" him, and this is also bad. For a third group, he commemorates "but not properly", and this is again bad.
Fierce battles are being waged on social networks and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.
The Primate does not read any of this. He simply prays, for some, and for others, and for the third group…
Read also
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.
Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed
The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.
Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money
While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.