Should His Beatitude commemorate the head of the ROC or not?
Metropolitan Onuphriy. Photo: UOC press service
At the end of January, American Archbishop Elpidophoros of the Constantinople Church criticized the hierarchs and Primate of the UOC for not commemorating Patriarch Kirill.
'Since these hierarchs (UOC. – Ed.), and possibly Metropolitan Onuphrius himself, refuse to commemorate the Patriarch of the ROC, how can they claim that they are the canonical Church?" the archbishop asks. And here it must be noted that from the side of the Phanar hierarch, this is not at all concern for the canonical status of the UOC, but an attempt to advance the interests of his structure. Literally in the next sentence, he calls on His Beatitude Onuphrius to commemorate the Constantinople Patriarch instead of the Russian Patriarch.
And a few days later, MP Bobrovska stated that she would write to the SBU because Metropolitan Onuphriy commemorates Patriarch Kirill. Supposedly, it's terrible when Onuphriy commemorates the Russian Patriarch, but not the Constantinople and Alexandrian ones.
There is also a third party – some «experts and interpreters» of canons living in the north. They cannot stand Archbishop Elpidophoros, but on the issue of commemorating or not commemorating the ROC Patriarch in Ukraine, they find themselves in a situational alliance with him. They agree that His Beatitude does not commemorate the ROC Patriarch but disagree that the UOC should commemorate Patriarch Bartholomew.
And we are perplexed. The Primate of the UOC has been commemorating the name of the head of the ROC along with the names of other Primates of Local Churches during the Great Entrance since May 2022. For almost 4 years now, he has been doing this at every service using the same formula. But nevertheless, for some he "does not commemorate" Patriarch Kirill, and this is bad. For other, he "commemorates" him, and this is also bad. For a third group, he commemorates "but not properly", and this is again bad.
Fierce battles are being waged on social networks and screens about how Metropolitan Onuphrius should act and how he should not.
The Primate does not read any of this. He simply prays, for some, and for others, and for the third group…
Read also
From sanctuary to storage: how seized UOC churches are being repurposed
In Korsun-Shevchenkivskyi, members of the OCU are reportedly using the Church of the Savior Not Made by Hands – seized from the UOC – as a storage site for clothing.
Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?
A man who stole food from soldiers in wartime is allowed the privilege of freedom, while a hierarch who fed hundreds of destitute refugees in the Lavra is denied even the possibility.
“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”
One of the most disgraceful phenomena in the life of Ukraine’s present-day religious community is its complicity in justifying the crackdown on the UOC.
Why people heroize those who beat TRC
Why does the head of the UGCC publicly call for war until victory, while quietly hiding draft-dodging workers in temples? Why do OCU bloggers delete posts supporting the TRC due to massive hate?
On the long-awaited statements by Oleksandr Usyk
Oleksandr Usyk has declared that he is ready to become president. The only question is – whom does he now see as his voters?
Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?
So this is what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like. One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood – the other blesses people with angle grinders.