Do Ukrainians without heat and eeectricity really do nothing but rejoice and dance?

Sviatoslav Shevchuk in Rome. Photo: UGCC

In Rome, UGCC head Sviatoslav Shevchuk declared that “unbreakable” Ukrainians respond to the loss of heat and light with joy, songs, and dancing. He said that Kyiv residents, while sheltering at warming centers, “did not weep in despair, but sang and danced.”

“This image of people who are freezing, yet singing and dancing to music, has already become historic and has astonished the whole world,” Shevchuk asserted. “And today I can confirm that this strange endurance, this joy of a nation that looks death in the face every night, does not come from man – it is a gift of the Holy Spirit.”

He even quoted a five-year-old girl who allegedly told him, “If I defeat the cold – then Ukraine will win.”

At first glance, these are lofty words from a pastor who sees in the people’s resilience the action of divine power. But look again – and the picture darkens.

Yes, those Kyiv residents who try to find even a sliver of light in today’s brutal hardship deserve respect. But what, precisely, is Shevchuk telling Europe? The message is starkly simple: Ukrainians can endure without heating and electricity for as long as it takes. Keep the war going. Keep the pressure on. Keep the funding flowing. They will endure.

Is that true?

Are we really expected to believe that a small child – spending weeks in darkness, cold, and hunger (and on Kyiv’s Left Bank many homes rely on electric stoves) – would speak in solemn, triumphant slogans about “defeating the cold” for the sake of national victory? With all due respect, this sounds less like a child’s voice and more like a carefully staged parable.

And it matters because Shevchuk’s rhetoric does not exist in a vacuum. He has more than once criticized the U.S. plan for achieving peace in Ukraine. This statement belongs to the very same line: Ukrainians are ready to suffer for as long as necessary; they are being destroyed, yet they are cheerful; they freeze, yet they sing and dance.

But from the mouth of a structure whose one half lives abroad and whose other half is concentrated in the west of the country, far from the front, these words land with a chill of their own. They sound not uplifting – but eerily detached. Not pastoral – but painfully convenient.

Because the signal being sent to the world is unmistakable: the Ukrainian people are doing fine. They are coping. They are “unbreakable.” Just send more money – and they will keep enduring.

Only one question remains, sharp as ice and impossible to ignore. Not a question for donors. Not a question for diplomats. A question for the people themselves:

Are you really ready to be spoken of this way – as if your suffering is effortless, as if your grief is a hymn, as if your freezing nights are a spectacle for foreign applause?

Or is it time to stop turning pain into propaganda – and finally ask the nation, honestly, what it can bear, and what it should never be asked to bear at all?

Read also

A hint at a new demographic reality?

It appears that we are facing a mass influx of migrants from the poorest countries of Africa and other regions. And the absolute majority of them will profess Islam.

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.