Do Ukrainians without heat and eeectricity really do nothing but rejoice and dance?
Sviatoslav Shevchuk in Rome. Photo: UGCC
In Rome, UGCC head Sviatoslav Shevchuk declared that “unbreakable” Ukrainians respond to the loss of heat and light with joy, songs, and dancing. He said that Kyiv residents, while sheltering at warming centers, “did not weep in despair, but sang and danced.”
“This image of people who are freezing, yet singing and dancing to music, has already become historic and has astonished the whole world,” Shevchuk asserted. “And today I can confirm that this strange endurance, this joy of a nation that looks death in the face every night, does not come from man – it is a gift of the Holy Spirit.”
He even quoted a five-year-old girl who allegedly told him, “If I defeat the cold – then Ukraine will win.”
At first glance, these are lofty words from a pastor who sees in the people’s resilience the action of divine power. But look again – and the picture darkens.
Yes, those Kyiv residents who try to find even a sliver of light in today’s brutal hardship deserve respect. But what, precisely, is Shevchuk telling Europe? The message is starkly simple: Ukrainians can endure without heating and electricity for as long as it takes. Keep the war going. Keep the pressure on. Keep the funding flowing. They will endure.
Is that true?
Are we really expected to believe that a small child – spending weeks in darkness, cold, and hunger (and on Kyiv’s Left Bank many homes rely on electric stoves) – would speak in solemn, triumphant slogans about “defeating the cold” for the sake of national victory? With all due respect, this sounds less like a child’s voice and more like a carefully staged parable.
And it matters because Shevchuk’s rhetoric does not exist in a vacuum. He has more than once criticized the U.S. plan for achieving peace in Ukraine. This statement belongs to the very same line: Ukrainians are ready to suffer for as long as necessary; they are being destroyed, yet they are cheerful; they freeze, yet they sing and dance.
But from the mouth of a structure whose one half lives abroad and whose other half is concentrated in the west of the country, far from the front, these words land with a chill of their own. They sound not uplifting – but eerily detached. Not pastoral – but painfully convenient.
Because the signal being sent to the world is unmistakable: the Ukrainian people are doing fine. They are coping. They are “unbreakable.” Just send more money – and they will keep enduring.
Only one question remains, sharp as ice and impossible to ignore. Not a question for donors. Not a question for diplomats. A question for the people themselves:
Are you really ready to be spoken of this way – as if your suffering is effortless, as if your grief is a hymn, as if your freezing nights are a spectacle for foreign applause?
Or is it time to stop turning pain into propaganda – and finally ask the nation, honestly, what it can bear, and what it should never be asked to bear at all?
Read also
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.
Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed
The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.
Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money
While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.