Two weeks of OCU’s “brotherhood” talk to UOC: Any fruits yet?

Horobtsov against the backdrop of the seized Church of St. John the Warrior in Kyiv. Photo: Horobtsov's Facebook

On February 2, the OCU Synod addressed the UOC with a call for “constructive dialogue” and even set up a special commission to liaise with the UOC for the sake of “unity and fraternal peace.”

Two weeks passed. And what did we get?

Perhaps Dumenko’s team suggested the obvious first step for anyone who really wants peace – return at least some of the seized churches and say, plainly, “We were wrong”? Perhaps they appealed to the authorities: stop stripping the UOC of its historic shrines, stop pressuring communities, stop turning the Church into a battlefield?

No. Of course not.

Instead, we saw a neat little “fruit basket” – not of reconciliation, but of seizures.

February 9 – the Nativity of the Theotokos church in Kuzmyn, Khmelnytskyi Region, is taken.

February 12 – in the Cherkasy Eparchy, the OCU announced it would seize a UOC bishop’s residence in the city, citing a sham “meeting” of a community that exists only on paper, in someone’s imagination, or in a conveniently drafted set of minutes.

And February 14 – the grand finale: a group of radicals in hoods and balaclavas seizes the UOC church of the Martyr John the Warrior in Kyiv – the traditional method included, naturally: doors cut open with an angle grinder. Very “fraternal.” Very “constructive.” Very “peace-making.”

Now the place is being “managed” by the “Metropolitan of Donetsk,” Serhii Horobtsov – who, on the side, tries to smear the church’s real owners. He posts photos of empty bottles of Cahors used for Communion and makes snide remarks, as if to suggest UOC priests are close to being alcoholics: “Something like contemporary installation art: ‘empty bottles as a path to enlightenment.’”

Truly – the highest form of spiritual discourse: grab the church, then lecture the victims on morality.

And who blessed Horobtsov for this “mission”? Serhii Dumenko – the very same man who signed the “Appeal” about dialogue with the UOC. That’s quite an approach: preach brotherhood by day, bless bolt-cutters by night. It’s almost poetic. Almost.

Picture this.

A neighbor spends years sabotaging you – petty tricks, bigger attacks, constant hostility. Then one day he shows up with a warm smile and a bouquet of words: friendship, love, reconciliation. You start to wonder, for a second, whether something has changed.

And that same night he comes back, sets your door on fire, and dumps filth into your yard – then, with an expression of pure innocence, insists the “friendship offer” is still valid.

That is exactly what the OCU’s “dialogue” looks like.

One hand signs “appeals” about brotherhood. The other blesses people with angle grinders.

“S” – for sincerity.

Read also

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.