“There are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USSR”

Filaret Denysenko in his years as Exarch of Ukraine. Photo: open sources

Members of the RCC, the UGCC, the OCU, Protestants, and various Jewish representatives are dispatched abroad without the slightest embarrassment to attend international events where, together with government officials, they insist that Ukraine enjoys exemplary freedom of religion and that there is no persecution of the Church whatsoever. Anyone who says otherwise is branded a Kremlin agent.

For example, RCC Bishop Vitaliy Kryvytskyi spoke about his latest “advocacy” trip to the United States in these terms: “We repeatedly encounter this reproach – this allegation – that there is religious persecution in Ukraine. As the All-Ukrainian Council of Churches and Religious Organizations, we say: today in Ukraine there are no signs of persecution precisely for faith.” He emphasized that under the USSR there were persecutions – but now, he says, they do not exist.

And now let us quote a church figure from the 1970s – from that very same USSR – speaking in an interview with the APN agency:

“It surprises me that our Church and the faithful are called persecuted. In the Soviet Union there are no people persecuted for their religious beliefs. Believers and non-believers in our country form a single society, engaged in active, constructive labor for the good of their Fatherland. The Soviet state treats the needs of the Church with understanding. Unfortunately, the Western press, using slanderous and biased information, seeks to mislead world public opinion.”

Knowing what the Bolsheviks actually did to the Church, can anyone seriously call these words truthful? The answer is obvious. Something else is just as obvious: replace “the USSR” in that quote with “Ukraine,” and you will have today’s statements – word for word in spirit – from Kryvytskyi, Zoria, Shevchuk, or whichever “chief rabbi” happens to be on duty.

The real author of the quote is Filaret Denysenko. These days he is older, weaker – no longer able to court the authorities with the vigor of his youth. But he has been blessed with remarkably gifted successors.

“Bishop, to the cause of serving the powers that be – be ready!”
“Always ready!”

Read also

On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak

Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.

On Budanov's statement regarding UOC

For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.

Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?

On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?

Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?

Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.

Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?

The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.

Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra

In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.