Why can a thief who stole from AFU walk out of SIZO, while Vladyka Arseniy cannot?
Sviridov the corrupt official and Metropolitan Arseniy. Collage: UOJ
Ukraine’s military intelligence reported the detention of Sviridov, the head of the AFU food supply service in Dnipropetrovsk region. According to the report, he was sending rotten products to the front, pocketing tens of millions in the process. With that money he bought villas in Bali, new cars, and more.
For now, Sviridov is in pre-trial detention – but he can walk out at any moment on bail set at 9 million hryvnias. For someone who reportedly spent 2.5 million hryvnias on clothing alone, that is pocket change. But that is not even the main point.
It has been nearly two years since Metropolitan Arseniy was thrown behind bars. His “crime” amounts to this: in a sermon, he criticized people at checkpoints near the Sviatohirsk Lavra who were blocking pilgrims from reaching the divine services. Both Sviridov and Metropolitan Arseniy are accused of offenses “against the AFU.” And yet the authorities’ attitude toward them could not be more different.
A thief who stole food from soldiers in wartime is granted the right to buy his way out – but a bishop who fed hundreds of broken, homeless refugees has no such right.
“J” stands for “justice.”
Read also
On the seizure of a UGCC сhurch in Tokmak
Statements by the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church about “blasphemy” are not the cry of a persecuted Church. They are a textbook example of double standards.
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.