DESS: We protect Muslims but ignore the UOC

Zelensky at an Islamic iftar. Photo: OP

The State Service for Ethnopolitics and Freedom of Conscience (DESS) has issued a statement that can, without any exaggeration, be called a textbook example of double standards.

Briefly about the situation. TSN released a story "Dangerous religious extremists already in Ukraine?", in which they discovered ties between Ukraine's Islamic community and the Russian Federation. Muslims took offense and complained to state bodies, including DESS. And now the State Service for Ethnopolitics has stood up for them, stating that "it is very important to distinguish proven facts from assumptions and associative relations."

The key theses of DESS:
• TSN does not comply with journalistic standards and ethics, since "the investigation in the story immediately took on an accusatory bias, and the accused themselves were not given a voice."
• The authors used “inaccurate or emotionally charged wording,” which creates: distrust toward religious communities, stigmatization of Ukrainian citizens based on their faith, and an increase in internal tension that benefits the enemy.
• Muslims are part of the Ukrainian political nation who "defend the state, suffer from Russian missiles and work for victory."
• TSN must remember that "in wartime, responsibility for what is said increases manifold."

Beautiful and wise words that are hard to argue with. But why do they only apply to Muslims, who make up about one percent of Ukraine’s population? Why don’t we hear statements from the State Service for Ethnopolitics in defense of the UOC, against which the media (including TSN) have been systematically inciting hatred for many years? The number of such reports has long run into the hundreds. Don’t they create “distrust toward religious communities, stigmatization of Ukrainian citizens based on their faith, and an increase in internal tension that benefits the enemy”?

Isn't the UOC "part of the Ukrainian political nation"? Don't its believers "defend the state, suffer from Russian missiles and work for victory"? Doesn't slander and incitement of hatred against them destroy the unity of the country?

The answers are obvious to everyone – except, it seems, to the authorities. They leap to defend a handful of Muslims – many of them from other ethnicities – while pointedly refusing to notice the persecution of millions of Orthodox Ukrainians.

Although, why say "refusing to notice"? It seems they are orchestrating it.

Read also

Lavra as a backdrop for a name-day celebration

Any service held by Epifaniy in the Lavra is simply an off-site event organized on the principle of “everything I need, I bring with me,” where the Lavra itself is used as a backdrop, a rented venue.

What is the difference between Dumenko and "Patriarch" Nikodym?

The difference between Dumenko and Kobzar is not in having or not having apostolic succession or spiritual gifts, nor in the depth of their theological knowledge.

Admit you're a Moscow priest – get a deferment

If you declare yourself a "Moscow priest," you are (according to the authorities' assurances) classified as "critically important infrastructure" and given a deferment. If you don't admit it, they force you to renounce your priesthood and go to war.

Why, by inciting hatred against UOC, you are inciting it against Christianity

UOC representatives have long warned the “patriotic confessions” that stirring up hatred toward the Church’s faithful would, in the end, turn against those who lit the fire.

Ukrainian rule of law: Will OCU clerics be jailed only for murder?

Courts hand down sentences to UOC clergy on absurd charges, while the state will not so much as wag a finger at OCU members for open incitement to violence.

Why the Lavra’s patronal feast passed in silence

Since the Lavra was handed over to the OCU, it comes to life only when Serhiy Dumenko is on site.