116 agreements with the aggressor in year five of war: Who must “sever ties”?
Photo caption: Zelensky at the Phanar. Photo: Anadolu Agency
Foreign Minister Sybiha declared – with great fanfare – that 116 (!) documents are being scrapped.
In other words, after more than four years of a bloody war, Ukraine still maintained active legal relations with the aggressor state. And the very same officials who, all this time, turned a blind eye to these ongoing ties with Russia were simultaneously demanding – with indignation – that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church sever its supposed “connections” with the Russian Orthodox Church, connections whose very nature they scarcely understand.
President Volodymyr Zelensky himself, with a grave expression, repeatedly claimed that the UOC maintains “legal ties” with the Moscow Patriarchate. Government officials on ethnopolitics, having pored over the charter of the Russian Orthodox Church, now insist that the Ukrainian Orthodox Church must somehow “eliminate” and “break” certain provisions. The country’s leadership continues to speak insistently about the need for “spiritual independence.”
But how can those in power presume to issue demands in the spiritual sphere when they have yet to put their own house in order? When, even during wartime, those closest to them were allegedly funneling money to Moscow? When high-ranking officials have stolen – or continue to steal – staggering sums from their own people?
Or was the entire media storm around the UOC nothing more than a smokescreen?
Read also
On Budanov's statement regarding UOC
For Yelensky and his the State Service of Ukraine for Ethnic Affairs and Freedom of Conscience (DESS), Budanov's statement was very untimely.
Why does OCU still celebrate Easter “with Moskals”?
On social media, “patriots” are again asking in exasperation: why are we still celebrating Easter with Moscow? How much longer?
Did Patriarch Bartholomew really mourn Filaret’s death?
Constantinople has never recognized Filaret as a patriarch – not “His Holiness,” not “honorary,” not under any title whatsoever. That alone makes the line in the Ukrainian presidential press service’s report sound astonishingly implausible.
Why did Dumenko sit in Metropolitan Onufriy’s chair?
The head of the OCU has his own residence – and Filaret’s residence as well. But what he needs is the Lavra, Metropolitan Onufriy’s office and chair.
Dumenko came up with a way to fill the Lavra
In fact, the St. Theodosius Monastery has been liquidated, and now "female monasticism" will be developed there.