Why has the Culture Ministry not been banned yet?
Photo: SBU
At the end of March, the SBU detained the head of a department within the Ministry of Culture on charges of justifying Russian aggression and praising Putin. The ministry promptly issued a statement saying that “the information disclosed by the SBU concerns an individual official and does not reflect the position of the ministry.” The message is clear – the entire institution cannot be branded hostile because of the actions of one official. Collective responsibility does not apply here.
Now consider other examples. Since 2022, several members of parliament have turned traitor and sided with Russia. There has been no formal statement by the Verkhovna Rada on this, yet no one in government, society, or the media claims that the parliament as a whole is a collaborator structure that should be dissolved.
Another case. After the annexation of Crimea, the overwhelming majority of SBU personnel on the peninsula turned traitor. A total of 1,391 individuals defected, including one major general and 47 colonels. In his book “The Showman,” Simon Shuster cites former NSDC Secretary Oleksiy Danilov as saying that at the start of the full-scale invasion, the highest number of deserters among law enforcement agencies was in the SBU.
Again, we do not hear accusations that the SBU as a whole is an enemy structure.
And rightly so. Neither the Ministry of Culture, nor the parliament, nor the SBU can be held responsible for the actions of individual people.
But when it comes to the UOC, this logic seems not to apply. Its clergy and even ordinary believers are now labeled as “Muscovites” and “spiritual occupiers.” Communities are driven out of their churches, monks from their monasteries, and the entire Church is being systematically pushed toward destruction.
When will logic begin to apply?
Read also
Zelensky's revoked order: What kind of heroes should Ukrainians have?
In recent years, the Ukrainian authorities have sought to present members of the OUN-UPA as heroes for all Ukrainians.
Religious processions banned – gay parades allowed
The authorities “respect rights, freedom, and human dignity” for many: Jews, pop and rock music fans, and now homosexuals. But Orthodox Christians are not among them.
Lavra's Dormition Cathedral and the money
While the construction of the entire cathedral cost approximately $12.5–13 million, more than $11.1 million is now being sought for its restoration. And that is only the “starting” figure.
Strike on the Lavra: what will the consequences be?
No one is saying that a strike on the Lavra, the portion of the Mother of God, is a level of absurdity beyond all limits – that after destroying hundreds of Orthodox churches, the war has now reached the very heart of our Orthodoxy.
Zelensky and the strike on the Lavra: grief for export?
If Russia’s strike on the Dormition Cathedral is, in Zelensky’s words, “barbarism,” then what should we call the Ukrainian authorities’ destruction of UOC churches? Is that not barbarism? Or is that somehow “different”?
How Epifaniy became a successor of the "occupier"
From the OCU's perspective, Bishop Ioann was the living embodiment of the very “spiritual occupation” of Ukraine and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra that they now claim to be heroically fighting against.